Search for: "California Accounts, Inc. v. Superior Court"
Results 281 - 300
of 367
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jun 2011, 11:08 am
, Inc., CV-10-5897-JF(HRL) (N.D. [read post]
21 May 2011, 10:45 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 7:30 am
Superior Court (2007) 41 Cal. 4th 747, 762. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm
Superior Court, 751 P.2d 470, [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 9:00 pm
Expedia, Inc., et al., Los Angeles Superior Court West District, Case No. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 8:12 pm
PaulkAmicus brief of the Government Accountability ProjectPetitioner's reply Title: Barr v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 9:30 pm
Such arbitration agreements have frequently been struck down as contrary to public policy, unconscionable substantively, and/or unconscionable procedurally on account of various features of such agreements.In Sonic-Calabasas, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 6:02 am
Bramalea California, Inc. (2001) 26 Cal.4th 1, 13-14, 17 (Foxgate).) [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 10:39 am
The superior court dismissed the motion, and the Supreme Court affirmed, noting that Mr. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 9:18 pm
Gonzalez, Chief Judge of the United States District Court, Southern District of California, in granting a plaintiff’s motion for a Temporary Restraining Order, stopped Washington Mutual or “WaMu” from foreclosing on the plaintiff’s home. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 6:45 pm
Superior Court which asks whether employers are required to ensure employees take breaks under the California Labor Code. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 9:29 am
In Citizens for Civic Accountability v. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 3:40 pm
Superior Court (Hohnbaum) is pending in the Cal. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 4:20 pm
Baldwin (aka BadBizFinder, Erin Baldwin, Beverly Sullivan) has finally received a PERMANENT injunction (gag order) from a Superior Court Judge against Erin Baldwin, BadBizFinder, and anyone associated with her ill-advised “anonymous consumer advocacy” organization. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 8:27 am
District Court for the Central District of California denied Bateman’s motion for class certification because Bateman failed to show that a class action would be the superior method of adjudicating his claim, as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b)(3). [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 2:25 pm
DauscherIn Bateman v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 6:07 pm
" The courts have begun to recognize that the most egregious terms, in which franchisees relinquish valuable rights without getting anything in return, may not be enforceable. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 4:02 am
§ 1679, et seq., prohibits provisions that purport to waive a consumer's right to sue in court for CROA violations.Pregnant welder sues employer for discriminationRoetzel & AndressOn August 10, 2010, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals issued its decision in Spees v. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 1:17 am
Superior Essex Inc. et al. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 10:12 am
The Superior Court granted the petition, the employees appealed, and the Court of Appeal reversed.The Court first determined whether to apply Federal or California law, which incorporate different standards for vacating arbitration awards. [read post]
