Search for: "California Company v. Price"
Results 281 - 300
of 1,495
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2014, 3:11 am
California and United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 9:38 am
In April 2022, a Shutterfly customer filed a class action lawsuit alleging Shutterfly violated California law by advertising false original prices to offer “phantom discounts” to customers who shop on Shutterfly.com. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 9:38 am
In April 2022, a Shutterfly customer filed a class action lawsuit alleging Shutterfly violated California law by advertising false original prices to offer “phantom discounts” to customers who shop on Shutterfly.com. [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 12:42 pm
Kahn v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 1:10 pm
(Del Vecchio v. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 6:07 am
Since the Trans Union case (Smith v. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 8:36 am
Zynga Game Network, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 2:59 pm
[x] In United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 11:20 am
[x] In United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2021, 1:32 am
As long as Apple is not considered a monopolist (and under the Epic v. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 7:35 am
California, where the case of Uspenskaya v. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 3:56 pm
In Quality King, L’anza Research International, a California shampoo company, sold to foreign distributors at rates which were 35% to 40% lower than the prices charged to its domestic distributors. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 3:56 pm
In Quality King, L’anza Research International, a California shampoo company, sold to foreign distributors at rates which were 35% to 40% lower than the prices charged to its domestic distributors. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 3:56 pm
In Quality King, L’anza Research International, a California shampoo company, sold to foreign distributors at rates which were 35% to 40% lower than the prices charged to its domestic distributors. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 3:56 pm
In Quality King, L’anza Research International, a California shampoo company, sold to foreign distributors at rates which were 35% to 40% lower than the prices charged to its domestic distributors. [read post]
4 Mar 2007, 8:32 am
Don't get too excited here; California is not yet stepping back from recent US Supreme Court opinions (Gore v. [read post]
25 Aug 2024, 9:01 pm
Conference v. [read post]
5 May 2014, 3:48 am
Supreme Court’s 2010 decision in Morrison v. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 7:35 am
Now California may be moving in that direction. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 9:01 am
The court summarizes: The record may demonstrate that, on a regular basis…, prospective customers try to bargain with LVSA based on pricing found on Groupon. [read post]