Search for: "California Employment Law Letter" Results 281 - 300 of 1,869
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jan 2022, 2:25 pm by David Urban and Ashley Sykora
The start of the New Year brought with it a new wave of labor and employment legislation that employers should note, including changes to many existing laws. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 3:21 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The new law largely codifies the ABC test adopted in Dynamex, meaning the test would serve as the standard in California for determining employment status. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 5:12 pm by David Klein
A litany of these cases are brought by Swigart Law Group, APC (“Swigart Law”), a law firm based out of California. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 10:45 am by Rob
Governor Brown signed several laws that change how employers do business in California. [read post]
23 May 2019, 5:38 am by Nassiri Law
Federal law, unfortunately, does not, and many states don’t have the supplemental protections that California enjoys. [read post]
Under California law, it is generally only necessary that the worker be subject to the "control of the employer" or "all the time the employee is suffered or permitted to work" in order to be entitled to pay. [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 6:01 am by Kit Case
This week, L&I sent a letter to the California-based Taco Bell of America LLC requesting representatives meet with the agency to discuss required changes in the company’s youth employment practices. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 12:58 pm by Stephen M. Fuerch
The law contains clear safeguards that prevent employers from forcing employees to undergo potentially stigmatizing psychological exams unless an employer has a legitimate business necessity for doing so. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 1:26 pm
Selected articles concerning employment related issues noted by law firmsSource: The Lexology newsfeed[New users can register free of charge at www.lexology.com/account/register.aspx]Telecom privacy newsArent Fox LLPAs part of the draft of a law governing workplace privacy, Germany has proposed placing restrictions on employers who want to use Facebook and other social networking sites when making hiring decisions.Did your business make the OSHA primary inspection… [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 11:51 pm
”Due to the current uncertainty in this area of the law regarding how to treat “no-match” letters, employers should consult with legal counsel before taking any action against employees who are the subject of “no-match” letters. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 7:52 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) against  Visalia, California -based Magnolia Health Corporation and its affiliates (Magnolia) highlights the need for healthcare industry and other U.S. employers adequacy and defensibility of their practices for offering accommodation to, hiring, screening and other employment practices with respect to persons with actual or perceived disabilities in light of the EEOC’s prioritization of disability… [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 10:08 am by Mark Tabakman
Under the California Opinion Letter, an employer that experiences economic difficulties and, for example, reduces the work week of exempt employees from five days to four and also reduces their salary by 20% will not run afoul of the “salary basis” test for these workers to still be considered exempt under California state law. [read post]
9 Dec 2021, 12:05 pm by Paul Cowie and Raymond Nhan
  This standard requires the trial court to review the PAGA settlement to promote PAGA’s purposes: to remediate present labor law violations, deter future ones, and to maximize enforcement of California’s labor laws. [read post]
28 Sep 2018, 9:40 am by Anthony Zaller
The post Responding to records requests by current and former employees appeared first on California Employment Law Report. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 7:21 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
 In a June 4 letter to employees, Metalcraft among other things, told these employees: … [A]fter June 4, the law prohibits requiring employees to pay Union dues. [read post]