Search for: "California v. Brady"
Results 281 - 300
of 329
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Sep 2010, 3:08 pm
§ 1681t, preempts a California statute that creates a private damages remedy for violations of state law with respect to the obligations of furnishers of information to CRAs.Certiorari-Stage Documents:Opinion below (9th Circuit)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionPetitioner's replyAmicus brief for the American Bankers Association et al.Amicus brief for the California Apartment AssociationAmicus brief for the Consumer Data Industry Association Title: Wilson… [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 7:03 am
Supreme Court in South Dakota v. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 11:47 am
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, January 17, 2008 US v. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 11:21 am
Storch’s prior informant history, in violation of his due process rights, and that the Court withheld material evidence in violation of Brady. [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 9:37 pm
Isom v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 10:39 am
., Football v. [read post]
18 Jun 2017, 4:10 pm
The case concerned the breach of an undertaking given by the Sun in a case brought by Ian Brady’s executor. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 1:10 pm
For example, they dismiss the holding in Dvora v. [read post]
9 Feb 2020, 7:53 am
Threat of Harsh Sentences Induce Wrongful Plea Agreements The Supreme Court in Brady v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm
Rasul v. [read post]
9 May 2014, 8:54 am
Aguilar, 13-677, a case in which California sought to reverse the Ninth Circuit’s determination that Brady v. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 1:09 pm
Miller, No. 06-11078 A conviction for tax evasion is affirmed where: 1) sufficient evidence supported the jury's verdict; 2) there was no abuse of discretion in various evidentiary rulings by the district court; 3) a claim the indictment was duplicitous failed as defendant was not prejudiced; and 4) a Brady claim failed as the cumulative effect of the suppressed evidence at issue did not undermine confidence in the verdict. [read post]
9 May 2010, 9:14 pm
Storey v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 12:35 pm
Sec’y for the Dep’t of Corr.); Brady challenges (Sochor v. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 8:39 am
• Frank V. [read post]
16 May 2012, 12:14 pm
The Court also rejected arguments regarding the production of documents, the ability of defendants to secure foreign documents by Letters Rogatory, or the production of documents under Brady v. [read post]
6 May 2012, 7:50 am
Supreme Court in Connick v. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 12:26 pm
Brady. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 12:48 pm
That is, one is looking at the Arizona rule independently of the question of how it fits with other states' rules.Bibb balancing - In Bibb v. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 12:54 pm
Radostitz then cited Kyles v. [read post]
