Search for: "California v. Marks"
Results 281 - 300
of 4,351
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Feb 2010, 9:50 pm
In Sand Hill Advisors, LLC v. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 9:00 pm
Asbestos Litigation in California: A Response to Mark Behrens By Gary M. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 12:49 pm
Governor Newsom Files Historic Amicus Brief in Death Penalty Case, Arguing for Greater Protections Against Racial Bias in Jury Proceedings Builds on Governor’s actions to end the death penalty in California and address systemic racism in the criminal justice systemGovernor Gavin Newsom today filed an amicus brief in People v. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 11:32 am
The consolidated cases of California v. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 2:54 pm
(Zelig v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 2:00 am
” Pursuant to this authority, Government Code Section 8523 provides for a 60 day review of gubernatorial reorganization plans by the Milton Marks “Little Hoover” Commission on California State Government Organization and Economy. [read post]
4 May 2011, 11:13 am
Nevertheless, relying on the California Supreme Court’s decision in Discover Bank v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 7:54 am
Co. v.. [read post]
9 Feb 2008, 8:25 am
Supreme Court in Phillip Morris USA v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 10:14 am
See Sparks v. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 8:00 am
The district court should consider the impact of the California Supreme Court's decision in Brinker v. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 4:13 am
Bras for the Cause Iowa, Inc. v. [read post]
21 May 2014, 10:33 am
Compass Restaurant * Ripoff Report and Topix Postings Protected by California’s Anti-SLAPP Law–Chaker v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 4:12 am
Lyons v. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 6:52 am
In denying a California piano retailer’s petition for rehearing, a panel of the U.S. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 2:05 pm
The unanimous decision in the case, known as The People of California v. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 1:29 pm
The law marks a major shift in California civil procedure law. [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 11:00 am
University of Southern California v. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 3:00 pm
Related Cases: Center for Genetics and Society v. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 7:48 pm
In 2003, he pled guilty to one count of “counterfeit of a registered mark” in violation of California Penal Code § 350(a)(2), which imposes criminal penalties on any person who “willfully manufactures, intentionally sells, or knowingly possesses for sale any counterfeit of a mark registered with the Secretary of State or registered on the Principal Register of the United States Patent and Trademark Office…” In… [read post]