Search for: "California v. Thompson" Results 281 - 300 of 415
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jan 2013, 1:13 pm by John Elwood
Florida, 12-6901, and Thompson v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 2:34 am by SHG
" News like this can't help but raise thoughts of the 1976 decision, Tarasoff v. [read post]
8 Jan 2025, 1:50 pm by Jeffrey P. Gale, P.A.
 See, e.g., Cleary, 111 Cal.App.3d 443, 168 Cal.Rptr. 722; Toussaint, 408 Mich. 579, 292 N.W.2d 880; Arie, 648 S.W.2d 142; Thompson, 102 Wash.2d 219, 685 P.2d 1081; see also Kiely v. [read post]
11 Mar 2018, 5:30 pm by INFORRM
Kerr, University of Southern California Gould School of Law GDPR and the Internet of Things: Guidelines to Protect Users&rsqu [read post]
21 May 2019, 11:57 pm by Florian Mueller
James Thompson (Qualcomm CTO) gave such long, fast, and practiced narratives on direct examination that Qualcomm's counsel had to tell the witnesses to slow down. [...] [read post]
8 May 2014, 12:44 pm by Mary Jane Wilmoth
LaserCase number: 09-cv-09144 (United States District Court for the Central District of California)Case filed: December 14, 2009Qualifying judgment/order: February 12, 2014 3/24/2014 6/23/2014 2014-30 SEC v. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 5:30 am
Proctor Hospital (employer liability for decisions by unbiased manager acting on information or advice from biased subordinates) Thompson v. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 3:08 pm by Anna Christensen
§ 1681t, preempts a California statute that creates a private damages remedy for violations of state law with respect to the obligations of furnishers of information to CRAs.Certiorari-Stage Documents:Opinion below (9th Circuit)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionPetitioner's replyAmicus brief for the American Bankers Association et al.Amicus brief for the California Apartment AssociationAmicus brief for the Consumer Data Industry Association Title: Wilson… [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 7:13 am
And so the trend continues, with the civil action brought against Kelly Van Halen by ELVH, Inc., the California IP holding company of the rock band VAN HALEN. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 8:08 am
Thompson, No. 07-1014 "Denial of a petition for federal habeas relief is affirmed over petitioner's arguments that: 1) he received ineffective assistance of counsel during his state trial for murder; 2) the revised 28 U.S.C. section 2254(d)(1) violates Article III, the separation of powers, and the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. [read post]