Search for: "California v. United States Environmental Protection Agency"
Results 281 - 300
of 568
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Oct 2017, 2:19 pm
Protect Telegraph Hill v. [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 2:19 pm
Protect Telegraph Hill v. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 3:13 pm
” The California Supreme Court declared later in People v. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 3:13 pm
” The California Supreme Court declared later in People v. [read post]
17 Sep 2017, 9:30 pm
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) waiver from federal standards. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 1:05 am
In Murr v. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 1:05 am
In Murr v. [read post]
4 Sep 2017, 2:20 pm
As of August 31, 2017, the Senate has confirmed including six Trump administration judicial nominees, including one Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, three judges for the United States Courts of Appeals, and one judge for the United States District Courts. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 7:48 pm
And so, the number of agencies requesting them and the number of requests per agency has been increasing and increasing. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 3:29 pm
Environmental Protection Agency and the U.S. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 2:19 pm
The Environmental Protection Agency and Army Corps of Engineers on Tuesday announced a proposed rulemaking that would rescind the “Clean Water Rule” — which the agencies finalized in 2015 to revise the definition of “waters of the United States” subject to federal jurisdiction under the Clean Water Act — and recodify the prior regulatory definition of such waters. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 2:19 pm
The Environmental Protection Agency and Army Corps of Engineers on Tuesday announced a proposed rulemaking that would rescind the “Clean Water Rule” — which the agencies finalized in 2015 to revise the definition of “waters of the United States” subject to federal jurisdiction under the Clean Water Act — and recodify the prior regulatory definition of such waters. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 8:15 am
” United States v. [read post]
14 May 2017, 4:05 pm
United States A California patient privacy case has reached the state´s Supreme Court. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 3:37 pm
Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 4:24 pm
See Monsanto Company v. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 5:03 pm
The products were distributed to California, Hawaii, and Nevada. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 11:43 am
United States, 2016 WL 6661146 (D. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 11:43 am
One report posited that Judge Aiken’s environmental law decision “opened a path for an eventual court-mandated, science-based plan to bring about sharp emissions reductions in the United States.[23] Yahoo! [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 11:43 am
One report posited that Judge Aiken’s environmental law decision “opened a path for an eventual court-mandated, science-based plan to bring about sharp emissions reductions in the United States.[23] Yahoo! [read post]
