Search for: "California v. Warner" Results 281 - 300 of 397
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2011, 11:36 pm by Marie Louise
TTAB affirms mere descriptiveness refusal of STERNALVEST for sternal vests (TTABlog) District Court C D California: The Mongols have their colors back (for real): U.S. v Cavozos (Property, intangible) District Court S D New York: Numb Nuts, Part II: Olaes Enter., Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 1:54 am by Marie Louise
Autodesk (Electronic Frontier Foundation) FilmOn – Warner Music director profited from piracy: FilmOn v. [read post]
25 Jun 2016, 7:03 am by Rishabh Bhandari
Isaac Park analyzed the Supreme Court’s ruling in RJR Nabisco, Inc. v. [read post]
Extended Version:The 2016 FTC v AT&T Mobility decision at the 9th Circuit eliminated the Federal Trade Commission’s authority to enforce privacy rules on ISPs in Arizona, Alaska, Hawaii, California, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, and Washington. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 2:00 am by Marie Louise
Novartis Vaccines & Diagnostics (Pharma Patents) US: CAFC Affirms district court de novo review in section 146 action: Streck v. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 5:34 pm by Kelly
Rimini Street (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) District Court E D California: Furniture retailer enjoined from sending eBay VeRO notices: Design Furnishings v. [read post]
1 Oct 2022, 11:17 pm by Florian Mueller
The inflexibility of Apple's approach is, by the way, another reason (besides the 30% cut) why NFT startups complain about the app tax.Apple's inflexibility also affects currency conversion (Apple recently announced massive price increases in the eurozone and several other countries, and many app makers might actually prefer to keep the old euro prices).When I last commented on the pending Pepper v. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 9:06 am by Scott Hervey
District Court for the Central District of California handed a big victory to Warner Bros. when it ruled that Gotham Garage violated Warner Bros. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am by Ben
The BPI, which represents the three major recorded music labels, Universal, Sony and Warner as well as many independent labels, sent its first takedown request to Google in July 2011. [read post]
29 May 2014, 3:53 pm by Venkat Balasubramani
Time Warner (Catch-up Post) Court Says Plaintiff Lacks Standing to Pursue Failure-to-Purge Claim Under the VPPA – Sterk v. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 1:30 pm
The administration is supporting the manufacturer in that case, Warner-Lambert Co. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2008, 4:48 pm
I noted all the commentary in the legal blogosphere over it, as Chief Justice Roberts stepped aside in Warner-Lambert v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 7:10 am by LTA-Editor
The Second Circuit reasoned Aereo was unlikely to prevail in light of the court’s earlier decision in Cartoon Network LP, LLLP v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 1:53 pm by admin
Pfizer sought to reverse the First Circuit’s decision by arguing that the decision ran afoul of the Supreme Court’s decision Holmes v. [read post]