Search for: "Carr v. State"
Results 281 - 300
of 828
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 May 2017, 11:37 am
Carr (collectively, Wooster petitioners) and Buffalo Niagara Riverkeeper, Inc. commenced these CPLR article 78 proceedings seeking to annul the negative declaration issued by respondent City of Buffalo Planning Board under the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) with respect to the proposed construction of Queen City Landing in Buffalo’s Outer Harbor area. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 7:21 am
”See Goddard v. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 6:59 am
Penny sketched out the facts of the FKB v AbbVie litigation in the UK and the finding of Henry Carr J that it was appropriate to grant declarations that a dosage regime for a biosimilar product would have been anticipated or obvious at the priority date of a granted patent in the circumstances. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 7:18 pm
The court relied heavily on the case Carr v. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 7:18 pm
The court relied heavily on the case Carr v. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 8:18 am
Analogy with Arrow case unhelpful given factual differences between the caseMichael agreed that there are key differences between the facts of Arrow v Merck and the present case - an observation also made by Carr J in his judgment when he sounded a note of caution on the use of the term "Arrow" declarations. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 7:35 am
NVidia v Hardware Labs [2016] EWHC 3135(December 2016)This was the exam question posed here. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 8:16 pm
Reginald Carr, No. 90,044 (Sedgwick)Direct appeal; Capital murderDebra J. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 6:50 am
Henry Carr J disagreed. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 7:25 am
Carr J , whilst noting that it was no reflection on the solicitor who had originally given the statement, stated that he did not believe AbbVie's explanation for its decision to abandon the '656 patent because it was not credible given the context. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 7:09 pm
Carr --Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 1:29 pm
” Mason v. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 6:26 pm
Carr to Reynolds v. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 7:31 am
Bonetzky, 2015-Ohio-2741.Background of Tecumseh Landing, L.L.C. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 4:00 am
By Connie Carr, Partner at Kohrman Jackson & Krantz LLPOn December 28, 2016, the Ohio Supreme Court issued another opinion regarding real property valuation in Utt v. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 4:00 am
In Columbus City Schools Bd. of Edn. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 8:08 am
On December 22, 2016, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in State v. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 8:35 am
I BREAKING: Unanimous Supreme Court in Samsung v Apple finds that damages may be based on a component, not whole product I Will Iceland's EU trade mark end up on ice? [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 7:42 am
; Carter v. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 6:09 am
Carr is telling us to look with suspicion on all of those things, we ought instead to look with suspicion on Baker v. [read post]
