Search for: "Case v. Bowles" Results 281 - 300 of 1,079
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2018, 11:57 am by Thomas Surmanski
Non-Restricted FirearmsSection 10(1) of the SDT Regs outlines that an individual may transport a non-restricted firearm only if: (a) Except in the case of a muzzle-loading firearm that is being transported between hunting sites, it is unloaded; and (b) in the case of a muzzle-loading firearm that is being transported between hunting sites, its firing cap or flint is removed. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 11:57 am by Thomas Surmanski
Non-Restricted FirearmsSection 10(1) of the SDT Regs outlines that an individual may transport a non-restricted firearm only if: (a) Except in the case of a muzzle-loading firearm that is being transported between hunting sites, it is unloaded; and (b) in the case of a muzzle-loading firearm that is being transported between hunting sites, its firing cap or flint is removed. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 9:49 pm by Sarah Ralph and Alessandra Moussa
Key Takeaways The decision by the AAT should be seen in the context of the decision of Judge Neville in the Federal Circuit Court in Banerji v Bowles [2013] FCCA 1052, which was an application by Ms Banjerji for an interlocutory injunction to stop her employment being terminated by the department for the tweeting conduct. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 8:36 am by Venkat Balasubramani
The court cites to, Osinger, a Ninth Circuit stalking case we’ve blogged about, and US v. [read post]
31 Mar 2018, 7:48 am by Eric Goldman
Case citation: Lohan v Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc., 2018 NY Slip Op 02208, 2018 WL 1524714 (N.Y. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 10:57 am by Eugene Volokh
Garco filed a petition for certiorari, asking whether this Court's decisions in Auer and Bowles v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 9:50 am by Amy Howe
Although it sounds relatively esoteric, the legal issue at the heart of the case is quite significant in administrative law: whether the Supreme Court’s decisions in Bowles v. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 12:51 pm by Aurora Barnes
Secretary of the Army 17-225 Issue: Whether Bowles v. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 7:57 am by John Elwood
Secretary of the Army, 17-225 Issue: Whether Bowles v. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 3:45 am by Edith Roberts
At TribLive, Brian Bowling looks at Monday’s cert grant in Knick v. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 11:43 am by Aurora Barnes
Secretary of the Army 17-225 Issue: Whether Bowles v. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 7:06 am by John Elwood
The court has been holding this case for Rubin v. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 2:29 pm by Aurora Barnes
Secretary of the Army 17-225 Issue: Whether Bowles v. [read post]