Search for: "Challenger One Holdings, LLC"
Results 281 - 300
of 3,204
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jun 2023, 7:41 am
Colorado about the definition of true threats online 303 Creative LLC v. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 12:11 pm
By narrowing the standard to one that relators will find challenging to meet, this decision could have significant consequences, further altering the FCA landscape. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 12:04 pm
”[19] The Supreme Court emphasized that its opinion was narrow and that “[o]n infringement, we hold only that Rogers does not apply when the challenged use of a mark is as a mark” and [o]n dilution, we hold only that the noncommercial exclusion does not shield parody or other commentary when its use of a mark is similarly source-identifying. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 11:54 am
”[19] The Supreme Court emphasized that its opinion was narrow and that “[o]n infringement, we hold only that Rogers does not apply when the challenged use of a mark is as a mark” and [o]n dilution, we hold only that the noncommercial exclusion does not shield parody or other commentary when its use of a mark is similarly source-identifying. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 11:46 am
”[19] The Supreme Court emphasized that its opinion was narrow and that “[o]n infringement, we hold only that Rogers does not apply when the challenged use of a mark is as a mark” and [o]n dilution, we hold only that the noncommercial exclusion does not shield parody or other commentary when its use of a mark is similarly source-identifying. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 6:11 am
Pivotal Mobile eDiscovery (PME) offers a solution to these challenges. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 1:09 pm
” This case clearly has caught the attention of at least one of the justices. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 1:54 pm
Supreme Court issued its pivotal ruling in TransUnion LLC v. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 10:30 pm
., LLC, 2023 U.S. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 8:21 am
During the IPR the patentee (Parus Holdings) made a number of arguments supporting the validity of the challenged claims. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 8:00 am
On infringement, we hold only that Rogers does not apply when the challenged use of a mark is as a mark. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 2:21 pm
So clearly, at least one of the justices is taking a very close look at this case. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 9:19 am
This holding has implications for other cases where litigants attempt to overturn statutory precedents, especially longstanding ones.] [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 9:04 am
In Slack Technologies, LLC v. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 9:09 am
This is a Latin phrase where the ruling of a court becomes final unless one or both parties show cause for it not to be. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 2:24 pm
” GSA issued the solicitation under Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) parts 12 and 15, contemplating award of a contract with a five-year base performance period and five one-year option periods. [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 8:13 am
The IPR process is one of two main ways to challenge patents, along with challenging them in district court. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 10:51 am
Customer Connexx LLC, which followed a similar decision by the Tenth Circuit in 2021 in Peterson v. [read post]
31 May 2023, 11:21 am
See, e.g., Women's Surgical Ctr., LLC v. [read post]
30 May 2023, 11:54 am
Monaghan Trademark Owner Sues Over Alleged Twittersquatting–Coventry First, LLC v. [read post]
