Search for: "Change v. State"
Results 281 - 300
of 50,373
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2018, 9:05 am
The post Justice Kennedy: A justice who changed his mind appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 3:04 am
Patricia Cain (Santa Clara), Taxation of Same-Sex Couples After United States v. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 9:55 pm
While stating that the Office does not believe the change is mandatory, the notice cites the following reasons for the proposed change: The materiality standard set forth in Therasense should reduce the frequency with which applicants and practitioners are being... [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 4:54 am
Mark Brandon's new book, State of Union: Family and Change in the American Constitutional Order, will be out next month from the University Press of Kansas. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 1:23 pm
” Nash, slip op. at 13 (citing United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 8:44 am
Supreme Court's decision in Bates v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 5:51 am
State v. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 4:50 am
Here are the materials in State of South Dakota v. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 7:57 pm
Haik's protest, the State Engineer approved the change application.Mr. [read post]
22 Jul 2017, 5:01 am
The court in Sacklow v Betts very recently encountered the issue of a legal name change in NJ for a transgender child. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 10:40 am
Juliana v. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 3:00 am
In Gyorke-Takatri v. [read post]
8 Oct 2007, 8:38 am
In Rita v. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 8:08 am
In State by Highway Commissioner v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 12:36 pm
The United States Supreme Court’s February 20, 2019 decision in Timbs v. [read post]
25 Apr 2021, 1:42 pm
Supreme Court’s 1976 decision in United States v. [read post]
14 May 2011, 2:45 am
Law Lessons from J.T. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 3:50 pm
Former Governor Schwarznegger's State Labor Commissioner Angela Bradstreet had raised some eyebrows among the plaintiffs' bar by backing the employer side in Brinker Restaurant v. [read post]
18 Feb 2023, 3:00 am
Co. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 1:17 am
On 1 November 2017, the Supreme Court unanimously dismissed the appeal in R (C) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2017] UKSC 72, relating to whether, in the context of awarding Jobseeker’s Allowance (‘JSA’), the State unjustifiably interfered with the right of transgender persons to have information about their gender reassignment kept private. [read post]
