Search for: "Child v. Social Security Administration"
Results 281 - 300
of 543
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2016, 10:59 am
Perhaps you seek various government benefits that you would be entitled to if you were adopted, such as Social Security benefits if you are still a minor, benefits through the Veterans Administration, et cetera. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 8:32 pm
In addition, EPTL § 8-1.4 authorizes the Attorney General to institute proceedings to secure the proper administration of non-profit corporations. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 8:49 am
The track, “On Fire,” caught fire online—but the viral clip also caught the attention of prison administrators. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 6:50 am
It is undisputed that Beckett, as the creator and administrator of the page, posted the comments. [read post]
5 Dec 2015, 10:18 am
In 2012, the United State Supreme Court dealt with rights of a posthumously conceived child to the Social Security survivor’s benefits of the deceased parent in Astrue v. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 9:04 pm
There are numerous decisions, however, in which criminal liability was based upon harm to a child by a person not the child's parent who assumed responsibility for the child's care, even if only for a short period of time. [read post]
7 Nov 2015, 5:47 am
" Adam Klein looked at the issues at play in Spokeo v. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 12:51 pm
Those with civil unions who have not moved forward with full marriages still cannot receive federal marriage benefits, including those related to taxes or Social Security. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 12:51 pm
Those with civil unions who have not moved forward with full marriages still cannot receive federal marriage benefits, including those related to taxes or Social Security. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
., the cloud);[28] the Snowden disclosures and resulting suspicion of U.S. surveillance practices in Europe;[29] the U.S. government’s reaction to those disclosures;[30] the increased use of encryption;[31] the rise of ISIL and recent attacks including those involving Charlie Hebdo and the French high-speed train;[32] increased surveillance authorized by new foreign laws;[33] and perhaps other aggressive counter-terrorism activities by European governments that may be at least indirectly… [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 8:08 am
Even so, we need not lose sleep about same-sex marriage equality leading to the Social Security Administration having to recognize all 78 of Warren Jeffs’ [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 8:52 am
Colvin: SSDI Denials and Appeals appeared first on Massachusetts Social Security Disability Lawyers Blog. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 5:09 am
G1 was naturalised as a British citizen in 2000 (after arriving in the UK as a child and being granted indefinite leave to remain as the child of his refugee father). [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 3:54 pm
The Illinois Supreme Court held, in Heck v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 6:19 am
On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court erred in failing to reduce the amount of the arrearage by the amount of dependency benefits paid directly to the plaintiff, as custodian of and representative payee for the child, by the Social Security Administration, as additional support for the child in light of the awarding of Social Security disability benefits to the defendant. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
In the first, a believer could not refuse to obtain a social security number for a child and in the second, believers could not block the federal government’s plans for government land. [read post]
7 May 2015, 6:29 am
The appeals court noted for the sake of completeness that, unlike the VA, the Social Security Administration will cut of disability benefits to a person deemed disabled if he or she obtains “substantial gainful employment. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 6:00 am
As Justice Fish stated in Toronto Star Newspapers Ltd v Ontario, “In every constitutional climate, the administration of justice thrives on exposure to light — and withers under a cloud of secrecy. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 9:55 am
New York’s Board of Education has got to be hoping the Court doesn’t do social promotion, because four repeats is usually enough for most people just to give in. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 6:00 am
First, patients could argue that their section 7 “right[s] to life, liberty and security of the person” are unjustifiably infringed by legislation that limits access to medical services. [read post]
