Search for: "Citizens for Constitutional, et al. v. United States, et al."
Results 281 - 300
of 467
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2012, 12:14 pm
The case is American Tradition Partnership, Inc., et al., v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 9:01 pm
The case is Lair et al v. [read post]
9 May 2012, 9:28 am
See also, for a recent review of climate change liability around the world, Climate Change Liability: Transnational Law and Practice, Richard Lord, et al (eds.) [read post]
1 May 2012, 1:01 pm
The sequel case is American Tradition Partnership, et al., v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 4:29 am
Suhail Najim Abdullah Al Shimari, et al. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 10:55 pm
” Extradition to the US – the Abu Hamza judgment As set out in a post by Isabel McArdle, further to a decision by the Strasbourg Court (which is not final yet – Hamza et al have 3 months in which to seek an appeal in the Court’s Grand Chamber), Abu Hamza and Babar Ahmad may now be extradited to the US. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 7:54 am
Amicus brief of Public Knowledge et al. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 2:15 pm
The plaintiffs have two main arguments, which they summarize: The Act improperly authorizes that civilians in the United States be detained indefinitely by the military, that they be tried by military commission or military court and that they may be subject to removal to other jurisdictions in violation of the Amendments V and VI of the Constitution. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 7:59 am
The publishing and academic worlds are watching the clock tick down to the perhaps historic decision of federal judge Orinda Evans in Cambridge University Press et al v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 4:05 am
It is important to emphasize, therefore, just how unprecedented that challenge is—and the potentially profound impact it could have on countless federal spending programs if the Court were to embrace it.It has long been accepted, without a whisper of any constitutional doubt, that “[a]lthough participation in the Medicaid program is entirely optional, once a State elects to participate, it must comply with the requirements of the [Act],” Harris v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 11:00 pm
All previous government mandates of individual behavior that have an economic consequence primarily affect an American's responsibilities as a citizen with the United States. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 3:00 am
Circuit in the Seven Sky v. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 8:51 am
Washington, United States v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
Taft, The Religious Convictions of an American Citizen (1916) William H. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 12:07 pm
In the case of Woollard et al v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 11:01 am
Sarei, et al. (11-649). [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 12:05 pm
Hoffman, of course, had a core argument of considerable merit, in Kiobel, et al., v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 11:05 am
: the failure of safe drinking waterenforcement in the United States. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 5:57 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 5:40 am
, 466 US 485 (1984); and United States v. [read post]
