Search for: "City of Los Angeles v. Superior Court" Results 281 - 300 of 367
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Mar 2014, 8:37 pm by Schachtman
Advance Auto Parts, No. 431525 California Superior, Los Angeles Cty. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 7:42 am by Dave Maass
The Error 404 Transparency Not Found Award: FOIAonline The Literary Judicial Thrashing of the Year Award: Pennridge, Penn., School District The Photographic Recall Award: Los Angeles Police Department The Cops Anonymous Award: Chesterfield County Police Department, Va. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 10:05 am by Eugene Volokh
Johnson, Los Angeles County), there was at least a tentative decision concluding that § 367.3 wouldn't ordinarily call for retroactive pseudonymization; the court took the view that such requests remain subject to the standard California sealing rules, Cal. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 6:36 am by Mandelman
 BC410890) APPEAL from an order and a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Michael L. [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 1:10 am
District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and Los Angeles County Superior Court. [read post]
City of Los Angeles (2011) 201 Cal.App.4th 455, 473. stated, “despite [CEQA’s evident concern with protecting the environment and human health, its relevant provisions are best read to focus almost entirely on how projects affect the environment. [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 5:11 am by David G. Badertscher
District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and Los Angeles County Superior Court. [read post]
City of Los Angeles, 191 Cal.App.3d 259 (1987), these provisions did not confer the ability to mitigate environmental impacts in a meaningful way. [read post]
City of Los Angeles, 191 Cal.App.3d 259 (1987), these provisions did not confer the ability to mitigate environmental impacts in a meaningful way. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:13 pm by John Elwood
Los Angeles, 11-798, involves whether regulations implementing the Port of Los Angeles’s “Clean Trucks Program” are preempted by the Federal Aviation Administrative Authorization Act or, if you like living dangerously close to the edge of a Microsoft sticky-keys warning, the FAAAA. [read post]