Search for: "City of Los Angeles v. Superior Court"
Results 281 - 300
of 367
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am
The Cassidys and their son Daniel subsequently cross-complained against Blix Street for royalties allegedly owing.2 The trial of the case commenced in March of 2006, presided over by Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Lee Edmon. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am
The Cassidys and their son Daniel subsequently cross-complained against Blix Street for royalties allegedly owing.2 The trial of the case commenced in March of 2006, presided over by Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Lee Edmon. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 6:32 am
Co. v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 5:37 am
Only one decision out of DC, Los Angeles County v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 4:20 pm
Baldwin (aka BadBizFinder, Erin Baldwin, Beverly Sullivan) has finally received a PERMANENT injunction (gag order) from a Superior Court Judge against Erin Baldwin, BadBizFinder, and anyone associated with her ill-advised “anonymous consumer advocacy” organization. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 8:26 am
City of Los Angeles (1988) 206 Cal.App.3d 1528, 1533.) [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 2:26 pm
Lujan v. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 8:03 am
City of Los Angeles, was later withdrawn as a result of a settlement with the city. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am
Cal.), with respect to the Omega Chemical Superfund Site, located in Whittier, Los Angeles County, California (the “Site”). [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 11:07 am
,Petitioners,v.THE SUPERIOR COURT OF ORANGECOUNTY,Respondent;AURORA LOAN SERVICES, et al. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 2:06 pm
Superior Court, 30 Cal.4th 278, 285 (2003) (affirming that only the county can provide for compensation of employees); Valdez v. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 2:47 pm
Other Superior Court judges named Wednesday are: Mark V. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 2:47 pm
Other Superior Court judges named Wednesday are: Mark V. [read post]
20 Jun 2010, 12:08 pm
For example, the City of Oakland famously chose not to condemn the Raiders to prevent them from moving to Los Angeles, even though California courts ruled that it could. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 10:04 am
Click Here US District Court Decision in US v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 9:54 am
Click Here US District Court Decision in US v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 4:54 pm
City of Los Angeles, 47 Cal.4th 970 (2010), which held that a trial court has discretion in a FEHA case to deny a successful plaintiff his attorneys' fees when the plaintiff chooses to proceed in an unlimited civil jurisdiction, but recovers less than the jurisdictional minimum. [read post]
14 May 2010, 10:21 am
But on Friday, San Mateo County Superior Court Judge Clifford V. [read post]
10 May 2010, 3:34 pm
We argued that under California law, the public has a right to see the documents that led San Mateo County Superior Court Judge Clifford V. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm
According to a consent agreement filed in Kansas City with the U.S. [read post]
