Search for: "Clark v. Deal"
Results 281 - 300
of 795
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2011, 5:54 pm
As the case against suspect Jared Lee Loughner ramps up, legal professionals are dealing with the same questions, especially as they pertain to court proceedings. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 10:39 am
Rico v. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 9:39 am
Rico v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 12:21 pm
Casey, Boumediene v. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 12:09 pm
Law Lessons from SUZANNE ROSSI V. [read post]
12 Dec 2006, 2:02 am
Selling a warranty to a customer who had made it clear he thought he was dealing with Sky constituted misrepresentation by conduct if, as here, the warranty came from a wholly independent and non-approved source and the seller did nothing to correct the customer's mistaken belief.The IPKat approves of Briggs J's warning about the problem facing whoever comes second into a basically monopolistic market: we've seen the same phenomenon in the Jif Lemon case and in… [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 2:02 pm
Clarke PART V: NEW THEORY 22. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 3:31 am
Fischerthat only the portion of the sentence dealing with PRC was void; withdrawal of a plea now must meet the much stricter standards of a post-sentence motion… In State v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 11:30 am
Citing Gordon v. [read post]
20 Oct 2018, 6:07 am
Victoria Clark posted their joint statement. [read post]
6 Jun 2015, 9:35 am
On June 4, 2015, the court decided Schaecher v. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 7:35 pm
Clark, 974 So. 2d 416 (Fla. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 4:08 pm
And, in Murphy v Callinan [2018] IESC 59 (30 November 2018) [36]-[44], Baker J (Clarke CJ and Dunne J concurring) in the Supreme Court approved Feeney J’s analysis in Collins (I will return to this case in a future post). [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 4:49 pm
The Excalibur Litigation resulted in a written judgment (“the Excalibur Judgment” and, along with the Transcript, the “Excalibur Material”) delivered by Christopher Clarke LJ dated 13 December 2013 ([2013] EWHC 2767) [8]. [read post]
18 May 2016, 9:57 am
However, there are circumstances (as Master Clark recognised in The Entertainer (Amersham) Limited v The Entertainer FZ and others ([2016] EWHC 344 (Ch)) where a) the value of an injunction (and not purely the value of damages), b) the size of the parties and c) the complexity of the claim should all properly be taken into consideration before making an order to transfer a claim away from the forum where it has been issued. [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 4:07 pm
Circuit’s hearing in Trump v. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 10:02 am
To read the issue in M&G Polymers USA, LLC v. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 4:45 pm
Defamation law is able to protect individuals who have been accused of being a racist; Greenstein v Campaign Against Anti-Semitism [2020], Tilbrook v Parr [2012], Hays Plc v Hartley [2010].[2] The subject of defamation law is the reputation of the individual. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 4:13 pm
While there was sympathy for Ms H’s position, this could not determine broader principles.Lord Mance, with Lord Clarke agreeing, would have allowed the appeal. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 4:13 pm
While there was sympathy for Ms H’s position, this could not determine broader principles.Lord Mance, with Lord Clarke agreeing, would have allowed the appeal. [read post]
