Search for: "Clark v. May et al"
Results 281 - 300
of 332
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jan 2010, 4:37 pm
Fresh produce contaminated during cultivation, harvesting, processing, and distribution has also been a source of hepatitis A (Butot et al., 2008; Calder et al., 2003; Fiore, 2004; Hutin, et al., 1999; Wheeler, et al., 2005). [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 7:55 am
MARIA KRASHENINNIKOFF, ET AL., App. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 8:18 am
Law Lessons from CZESLAW CIAPINSKI, ET AL. [read post]
30 Dec 2009, 3:44 am
Kimberly-Clark Corporation v. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 8:48 am
Decided on December 22, 2009 Sweeny, J.P., Catterson, Renwick, Freedman, Abdus-Salaam, JJ. 1847 117179/07 [*1]Ted Moustakis, Plaintiff-Appellant, v Christie’s, Inc., et al., Defendants-Respondents. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 7:53 am
Law Lessons from THE ESTATE OF ELYREE SMILEY, ET AL. [read post]
24 Oct 2009, 8:55 am
Pass, et al., Case No. 138634, stating that the Appeals Court “erred in analyzing this case under the lost-opportunity standard set forth in MCL 600.2912a(2). [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 10:00 am
Roberts, et al., Respondents, vTishman Speyer Properties, L.P., et al., Appellants. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 9:49 am
MAUREEN BELL ASTERBADI, ET AL., App. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 9:03 am
Law Lessons from RABONE GOOLSARRAN, ET AL. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 9:49 am
D'AMICO, ET AL., App. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 6:31 pm
Cir. 1986) (describing the analytical method as "subtract[ing] the infringer's usual or acceptable net profit from its anticipated net profit realized from sales of infringing devices"); see also John Skenyon et al., Patent Damages Law & Practice § 3:4, at 3-9 to 3-10 (2008) (describing the analytical method as "calculating damages based on the infringer's own internal profit projections for the infringing item at the time… [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 8:13 am
RONALD DEVITO, ET AL.; (A-4951-06T1; Decided August 3, 2009): Picture by PhillipC Notwithstanding any limitations in the language of a Will, the probable intent of the testator must prevail. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 3:32 am
SUSANNE ZIEGLER, ET AL. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 10:56 am
The Wilderness Society, et al. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 1:08 pm
Dice Electronics, LLC et al (9-08-cv-00163) (Feb. 20. 2009)Judge: Ron ClarkDefendant filed a motion for stay, noting that it had filed an ex parte reexamination of patent in suit. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 9:54 am
Clark issued his decision Aug. 18, 2008. *** Cintas Corp. (4-CA-34160, et al.; 353 NLRB No. 81) Cincinnati, OH Jan. 30, 2009. [read post]
2 Jan 2009, 8:22 am
Mitchell, Brewer, et al v. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
’ paper by Graeme Clark SC (IP Down Under) Full Federal Court decision concerning brand reputation in context of ‘lookalike’ products and famous brands: Hansen Beverage Company v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Ltd (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) Federal Court holds that grace period applicable to a ‘parent patent’ is different to that of its divisional ‘child’: Mont Adventure Equipment v Phoenix Leisure Group (IP… [read post]
1 Nov 2008, 3:12 am
(IP finance) What a concept: sharing new inventions with the world is good for the inventor (Techdirt) Global - Copyright On verifying the Commons (Creative Commons) Australia High Court rules on contributory patent infringement: Northern Territory v V Collins & Anor (Managing Intellectual Property) Valuating IP: reputation in trade marks and section 60 evidence? [read post]
