Search for: "Clemente v. United States"
Results 281 - 300
of 459
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2012, 11:53 am
(Justice Breyer’s colloquy with Paul Clement, counsel for the state plaintiffs, invoking McCulloch v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 4:28 am
United States, 505 U.S. 144 (1992). [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 8:25 pm
(For example, United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 11:50 am
Note, by the way, that if fewer people buy cars, the price of cars might go down, not up, as Justice Scalia thought.Closest analogy: In United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 6:44 am
United States and Printz. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 7:02 pm
Justice Kennedy, writing for the majority in Bond v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 3:25 pm
Department of Health and Human Services v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 5:00 am
The United States also argues that the mandate is necessary and proper to carry out the law's insurance reforms. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 6:33 am
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, a United States Supreme Court case. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 1:04 am
Clement, a former Solicitor General of the United States (under the Bush-duh! [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:45 pm
” (Brief at p. 8)Of these, 1 and 2 are doing all the work, since 3 can be satisfied by any limitation at all on federal power – and as I and others have noted, that limitation is already provided by United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 7:31 am
Carrie Johnson of NPR reports that the Court’s opinion in United States v Jones (the GPS tracking case) “set off alarm bells inside the FBI, where officials are trying to figure out whether they need to change the way they do business. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 7:02 am
Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health and Human Services, et al. (11-393), United States Department of Health and Human Services, et al., v. [read post]
17 Mar 2012, 3:32 pm
” (15) But the brief also has so many citations to United States v. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 3:35 pm
Sebelius, HHS v. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 8:12 am
At PrawfsBlawg, Michael Mannheimer asks how professors should teach United States v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
Taft, Anti-Semitism in the United States (1920) Benjamin N. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 6:40 am
At the WSJ Law Blog, Joe Palazzolo reports that Paul Clement has advised corporate counsel to pay close attention to the outcome of United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 5:59 am
Supreme Court Insider: Our Supreme Court newsletter on Wednesday featured: an interview with Montana’s attorney general on the case from his state that could get the Court to reconsider Citizens United; a report on Paul Clement’s not-great day arguing before the Court; and a profile of Drinker Biddle’s Lawrence Fox, who got the Court’s attention with a powerful legal ethics brief in Maples v. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 11:48 pm
The group’s e-petition calls on the Ministry of Justice to “leave FoI alone”, stating, “the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOI) has exposed the scandal of MPs’ expenses, and many examples of waste and improper behaviour by public authorities, politicians and public officials. [read post]
