Search for: "Cola v. State"
Results 281 - 300
of 626
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Aug 2014, 2:53 pm
(Connie Stafford v. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 10:38 am
v. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 10:30 am
v. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 8:43 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 1:29 pm
Coca-Cola Co., 134 S. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 9:45 am
Coca-Cola). [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 11:00 pm
" In Madison Teachers, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 11:00 pm
" In Madison Teachers, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 9:00 am
Recently, a Louisiana state court carefully examined the terms of a non-compete in Gulf Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 8:28 pm
Metzler v. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 7:40 am
National Australia Bank (OT09), United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 12:40 pm
Coca-Cola Co. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 2:27 pm
Case citation: Pom Wonderful LLC v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 8:02 am
On June 26, 2014, in NLRB v. [read post]
22 Jun 2014, 7:28 pm
Consider one recent example: by a vote of eight to zero, the Justices reversed the Ninth Circuit decision in POM Wonderful LLC v. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 10:56 am
Coca-Cola resists this canon and its high standard. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 12:39 am
Coca Cola Company. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 10:17 am
The lower court ruled that the FDCA – a federal law that gives the United States Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) the authority to ensure the safety of a variety of goods, including beverages – precluded POM’s Lanham Act claims concerning the labeling and naming of the Coca-Cola beverage. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 2:09 am
The case is Case C-97/12 P Louis Vuitton Malletier v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Friis Group International ApS intervening, a ruling of the Eighth Chamber of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) of 15 May. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 1:50 pm
Pom competes in the pomegranate juice market with The Coca-Cola Company (“Coca-Cola”) Minute Maid® products. [read post]
