Search for: "Com. v. May" Results 281 - 300 of 3,197
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jul 2020, 4:00 am by John Gregory
(That political will may have been put in some doubt in much of the world over the past year or so.) [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 10:30 am by John Kennerty
They can evaluate your case and provide you with the appropriate direction – whether to continue to proceed with an injury claim – or provide you with reasons why your claim may not be valid. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 7:01 am by Lauren Rucinski
This relaxing of the sweeping anti-generic rule may indicate an uptick in trademark registrations for historically generic terms (as long as they include “.com”). [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 10:04 am by Josh Blackman
[The Court studiously avoided addressing a central element of the Electors' Argument] In May, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in the two faithless electors cases,  Chiafalo v. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 8:08 am by Laura J. Winston
Winston, guest bloggerThe Supreme Court of the United States has ruled in United States Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 8:08 am by Laura J. Winston
Winston, guest bloggerThe Supreme Court of the United States has ruled in United States Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 6:07 am by Jani Ihalainen
This includes that the the mark has to be one "...by which the goods of the applicant may be distinguished from the goods of others", i.e. it has to be distinctive. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 6:07 am by Jani Ihalainen
This includes that the the mark has to be one "...by which the goods of the applicant may be distinguished from the goods of others", i.e. it has to be distinctive. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 6:07 am by Jani Ihalainen
This includes that the the mark has to be one "...by which the goods of the applicant may be distinguished from the goods of others", i.e. it has to be distinctive. [read post]