Search for: "Consumer Class Cases Plaintiffs" Results 281 - 300 of 6,781
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2016, 3:12 pm by Stephanie Stroup (US)
Sometimes, although it seems like not very often, California courts do find that consumer fraud cases are not appropriate for class certification. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 11:38 am by Nicole Reustle
Slews of cases and victims would be disqualified from bringing a class suit. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 4:28 pm
Robinson Ford Sales, Inc., a case involving negative equity financing under the Automobile Sales Finance Act, Consumer Legal Remedies Act, and Unfair Competition Law. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 10:52 am by Aaron L. Vorce and Theodore W. Seitz
In fact, in certain class action cases, even where one thinks a Rule 12(b)(1) motion may simply result in an amended pleading, the motion may still ferret out facts pertaining to the named plaintiff that, while supporting the named plaintiff’s Article III standing, may undermine the requirements for class certification. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 3:00 pm
CAOC's Third Annual Class Action Seminar: Class Action Hurdles From The Plaintiff's Perspective will take place next Wednesday, January 28, 2009 at the Sir Francis Drake Hotel,450 Powell Street, San Francisco. [read post]
20 Sep 2009, 8:49 pm
As Matter of First Impression, because Plaintiff Settled her Individual Claims Following Denial of Class Action Certification Motion of Class Action Alleging Violations of Truth in Lending Act (TILA), Plaintiff Lacked Standing to Appeal Propriety of District Court Order Denying Class Certification Seventh Circuit Holds Plaintiff filed a putative class action against various Target entities alleging violations of the federal Truth in… [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 7:40 am by admin
 The case is currently pending before the District Court, with cross motions for class certification and summary judgment pending. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 7:40 am by admin
 The case is currently pending before the District Court, with cross motions for class certification and summary judgment pending. [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 5:40 am
Class Action Plaintiffs who are Residents of Colorado and Missouri Lacked Standing to Prosecute Class Action Complaint Alleging Violations of Illinois State Statutes Plaintiffs filed a putative class action in Illinois state court against Bally Total Fitness for violations of the state’s Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act (Consumer Fraud Act) and Physical Fitness Services Act (Fitness Act). [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 11:51 am by Scott Shaffer
Hayes sided with Household Finance, and required the plaintiff to go to arbitration, where she could not proceed with the class action. [read post]
12 Nov 2006, 10:08 am
The Iowa consumer class action case against Microsoft begins tomorrow, November 13, 2006. [read post]
25 Jan 2008, 7:29 am
Without having to incur excessively high arbitration costs and with the ability to join claims and gain class action status, consumers will more easily be able to find North Carolina consumer attorneys who are able to bring claims on smaller cases which before were economically unfeasible. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 3:30 am
The plaintiff, Walsh Chiropractic, Ltd., filed this putative class action in the Third Judicial Circuit in Madison County, Illinois, alleging various breach of contract theories and a violation of the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act (“ICFA”).The plaintiff then filed its first amended class action complaint, adding two additional counts, one for unjust enrichment and the other alleging violations of the Racketeer… [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 7:35 am
A class action is an action brought on behalf of all members of a designated class of plaintiffs who claim to have been adversely affected by the defendant's wrongful conduct and who seek relief. [read post]
8 May 2007, 8:01 am
This is very difficult research because there is no real control group: After all, post-CAFA, plaintiffs have forum choice in very few consumer class actions. [read post]
2 May 2022, 10:19 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Ramirez, 141 S.Ct. 2190 (2021), Premier argued that plaintiff didn’t show that each class member has Article III standing. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 7:37 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Rule 23(b)(2) injunctive relief class: The court refused to hold that plaintiff lacked Article III standing to bring a claim for injunctive relief, because that would denigrate the NY consumer protection statute by denying anyone who figured out that she’d been deceived from representing a class of the still-deceived. [read post]