Search for: "Counts v. Social Security Administration"
Results 281 - 300
of 380
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2013, 2:56 pm
Lawrence Lessig, on the other hand, suggests that this would have made a very large difference, perhaps removing the felony counts entirely. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:56 pm
Lawrence Lessig, on the other hand, suggests that this would have made a very large difference, perhaps removing the felony counts entirely. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 7:25 am
#7: Social Media Exceptionalism. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:21 pm
Code Section 4377(c) provides that the fees imposed by sections 4375 and 4376 are treated as taxes for purposes of subtitle F of the Code (sections 6001 through 7874 that set forth the rules of federal tax procedure and administration). [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 3:00 am
** The County contended that Retirement and Social Security Law §605 provides an alternate basis upon which it could apply for retirement benefits on White's behalf, but it did not make an application pursuant to that section. [read post]
23 Dec 2012, 5:55 am
Dec 7 Social Security Announces New Compassionate Allowances Condition Dec 6 When can an employer ask an applicant to “self-identify” as having a disability? [read post]
21 Sep 2012, 5:47 am
Maxwell, an employee of the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV), assisted [Laiwala] by processing false DMV test scores, and Howard assisted in obtaining false Social Security numbers.People v. [read post]
17 Sep 2012, 8:52 pm
See Curry v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 8:10 pm
The plaintiffs in Applewhite v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 1:53 pm
" For example, despite protests from many expert technologists, the House passed a cyber-security bill (CISPA). [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 9:19 am
That “fundamental” change was worked seventy-five years before by the Social Security Act and fifty years before with Medicare. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 10:31 am
In McGavin, for example, regular attendance at work is noted as one such implied term in the contract; failing to attend would, in a common law regime, count as breach of contract and be cause for dismissal.[3] In the contractual regime lawmakers have often either mandated or forbade inclusion of specific terms in some general class of contract. [read post]
25 May 2012, 8:00 am
” The Social Security Administration denied the application, reading the act to entitle biological children to benefits only if they were qualified to inherit as a decedent under state intestacy law. [read post]
25 May 2012, 8:00 am
The Social Security Administration denied the application, reading the act to entitle biological children to benefits only if they were qualified to inherit as a decedent under state intestacy law. [read post]
24 May 2012, 4:19 am
Employment Division v. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 11:09 am
As a result of the 1973 case Gagnon v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 6:26 pm
Titles V and VI - Relaxation of mandatory Exchange Act registration standard for record holders Increases number of record holders triggering mandatory registration to 2,000, no more than 500 of which may be unaccredited Excludes holders of employee benefit plan securities Increases thresholds for bank holding companies Implementation: Effective immediately. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 10:54 am
Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319 (1976), the Supreme Court concluded that a full evidentiary hearing is not required before terminating disability benefits (a property right) under the Social Security Act. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 10:54 am
Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319 (1976), the Supreme Court concluded that a full evidentiary hearing is not required before terminating disability benefits (a property right) under the Social Security Act. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 10:54 am
Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319 (1976), the Supreme Court concluded that a full evidentiary hearing is not required before terminating disability benefits (a property right) under the Social Security Act. [read post]
