Search for: "Cox v. Amend" Results 281 - 300 of 562
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2007, 8:03 am
Hawaii Department of Human Services (06-1267, cert. papers), involving a claim by blind vendors of a right to sue state and local government for denying them a preference in operating stands or vending machines in non-federal public buildings, and Cox v. [read post]
25 Feb 2012, 10:55 am by admin
The competition law update chapter in this new publication, prepared by our firm, includes discussions of: (i) the 2009 and 2010 amendments to the Competition Act, (ii) Competition Act enforcement and penalties, (iii) key enforcement developments in the past two years (including conspiracy and misleading advertising law developments), (iv) a discussion of key implications of Canada’s new competition laws for Canadian real estate agents and brokers, (v) a discussion of the… [read post]
25 Feb 2012, 7:58 am by admin
The competition law update chapter in this new publication, prepared by our firm, includes discussions of: (i) the 2009 and 2010 amendments to the Competition Act, (ii) Competition Act enforcement and penalties, (iii) key enforcement developments in the past two years (including conspiracy and misleading advertising law developments), (iv) a discussion of key implications of Canada’s new competition laws for Canadian real estate agents and brokers, (v) a discussion of the… [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 6:44 am by PaulKostro
However, the husband died without amending the pension plan documents to replace his ex-wife as the designated beneficiary. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 11:21 am
Here is a statement from SEC Chairman Cox - and here is a PCAOB statement. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 10:01 am by Law Lady
COX, et al., Appellees. 3rd District.Estates -- Wills -- Revocation -- Error to dismiss second amended petition for revocation of probate of will in which petitioner alleged that, due to undue influence and testamentary incapacity based upon lack of capacity and insane delusions, all wills executed by decedent after a 1983 will in which petitioner was beneficiary were invalid -- Petitioner pleaded sufficient allegations of standingMARLENE GORDON, Appellant, v. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 5:01 am by Jordan Brunner
Christopher Cox in a letter dated Aug. 13, 1999, that the Defense Department would comply (though he also cautioned that such a requirement might be inconsistent with existing law regarding civil liberties protections for U.S. persons). [read post]
21 Jun 2015, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
  We had a post on the judgment from Dirk Voorhoof and there were a number of other comments on the judgment from, amongst others Lorna Woods, Neville Cox and Glyn Moody. [read post]