Search for: "Cross v. Bear" Results 281 - 300 of 2,045
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Nov 2021, 4:01 am by Jan von Hein
The court held that the enforcement provision Article V (1) lit. a New York Convention applies already before or during arbitral proceedings. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 9:15 am by John Elwood
Cortesluna, 20-1539 (and denied cert in the cross-petition, Cortesluna v. [read post]
9 Oct 2021, 11:18 am by INFORRM
Supreme Court has agreed to hear a group’s challenge to Boston’s rejection of its request to fly a flag bearing the image of a Christian cross over city hall in a case involving religious and free speech right. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
Professor of Law & Director of Clinical Legal Education, UC Davis School of Law--Robert Cover as Critical Race Theorist   Mark Graber, University System of Maryland Regents Professor, University of Maryland Carey School of Law & Sandford V. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 10:58 am by Rebecca Tushnet
But these other insitutions don’t bear all the costs of effectuating their own purposes by using US registrations as a marker, and that contributes to the load on the PTO. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 2:00 pm by Giles Peaker
Axnoller Events Ltd v Brake & Anor (cross-examination on a draft witness statement) (2021) EWHC 2539 (Ch) I don’t know how many of you have been following the Axnoller v Brake litigation (parties vary, but are basically the same). [read post]
30 Sep 2021, 9:13 am by Amy Howe
The question arises in a lawsuit filed by a Christian group after the city of Boston denied the group’s request to raise its flag – bearing a Latin cross – on a city hall flag pole. [read post]
17 Sep 2021, 10:58 am by Eric Goldman
However, a more elaborate approach, with reflection on the specifics of emoji (e.g., cross-platform and cross-version diversity) and their paralinguistic qualities, would be desirable. [read post]
11 Sep 2021, 6:07 am by Russell Knight
“[A] party moving for a physical examination under [Rule 215] bears the initial burden of establishing good cause for the requested examination” Thompson v. [read post]