Search for: "D. (D.) VS. S. (A.), ET AL." Results 281 - 300 of 372
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2010, 4:02 am
Boston Scientific (Docket Report)(271 Patent Blog) District Court N D Illinois: Allegation that plaintiff ‘buried’ prior art in IDS is sufficient to state of claim for inequitable conduct: CIVIX-DDI LLC v National Association of Realtors et al (Docket Report) District Court Massachusetts: Attorney delinquence excuses 7 year delay in reviving expired patent: SprinGuard Technology Group Inc. v USPTO (271 Patent Blog) District Court Wyoming: Filing a patent on… [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 3:04 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
  It’s also the start of Black History Month, the annual celebration and triumph of the descendants of African-Americans. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 3:51 am
(GRAY On Claims) District Court E D Louisiana: Prior License of asserted patent does not bar imposition of permanent injunction: Innovention Toys, LLC v MGA Entertainment, Inc. et al(Docket Report) District Court N D California: Delay of five to seven years does not create undue prejudice sufficient to deny stay pending reexam: Spectros Corp v Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc (Docket Report) BPAI: Reissue cannot merely add new dependent claims (without cancelling… [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 8:38 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
National Indemnity Co., et al.,2009-SU-1529 (Adams Co., Dec. 22, 2009, Kuhn, P.J.). [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 6:51 am
Louise Ogborn, et al., Kentucky Court of Appeals, No. 2008-CA-000024-MR (November 20, 2009). [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 3:23 am
(Spicy IP) Taxing ‘royalties’ derived from intellectual property (Spicy IP)   Israel Jerusalem Court issues temporary injunction against copycat Challah cover manufacturers: Karashi International LTD., vs. [read post]
MARGARITA CAMACHO, ET AL.; from Hidalgo County;13th district (13-05-00361-CV, 251 SW3d 88, 01-17-08)The Court reverses the court of appeals' judgment and renders judgment.Justice Phil Johnson delivered the opinion of the Court [in pdf](Justice Guzman not sitting) [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 12:47 am
We certainly don't want credit card companies et al to have this power. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 5:14 am
Hewlett-Packard Co. v Acceleron LLC (Inventive Step) (IP Spotlight) District Court S D California.: Evidence relating to re-examination proceedings excluded from trial: Presidio Components Inc., v. [read post]
12 Dec 2009, 7:08 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Cosgrove et al., Phila, July Term, 2008, no. 3708 (request to sever UIM claim and third party claim denied). [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 9:11 am by Bill Ward
”   On November 24, 2009, the New York Court of Appeals issued its opinion in the matter of Daniel Goldstein et al vs. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 7:43 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Cosgrove et al., Phila, July Term, 2008, no. 3708 (request to sever UIM claim and third party claim denied). [read post]
28 Nov 2009, 12:18 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
Cosgrove et al., Phila, July Term, 2008, no. 3708 (request to sever UIM claim and third party claim denied). [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 9:10 am by Aviva Cuyler
(The opinion: League of Women Voters of Indiana, et al. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 3:18 pm
FDA's guidance documents, including this guidance, do not establish legally enforceable responsibilities. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 6:42 am
I have quite a few Florida clients that are doing this vs foreclosure. [read post]