Search for: "D. E.G. Y."
Results 281 - 300
of 749
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jul 2023, 9:43 am
But there's a part of me that responds: "Well, sure, but at least when I end up on the wrong side of an ambiguous statute, I can read the thing as well as anyone else, and go to a lawyer who can look at all the facts and says that it more likely will be interpreted to mean X instead of Y. [read post]
21 May 2015, 1:29 am
As regards portability, when consumers cross an internal EU border they are often prevented, on grounds of copyright, from using the content services (e.g. video services) which they have acquired in their home country". [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 4:55 pm
Do you have human rights protection mechanisms at the local level in your country (e.g. ombudspersons, human rights commissions, mediators, etc.)? [read post]
20 Jan 2017, 9:02 am
X in year one, Y in year two, etc. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 2:47 pm
Law enforcement agencies own their own ALPR data and if they choose to share it with other jurisdictions, the[y] can elect to do so. [read post]
29 May 2024, 1:43 pm
POL’Y & L. 229, 256 (2009). [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 12:43 am
Within states, substantial variation often occurred in the county rates, with some states experiencing a fourfold difference in death rates among counties (e.g., Colorado, Virginia, Kentucky, and Maryland). [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 3:47 pm
In this regard, some commentators (see e.g. [read post]
3 Dec 2007, 11:42 pm
Pol'y 435. [read post]
23 Mar 2007, 2:10 pm
See, e.g., Bowling v. [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 4:00 am
Comme le législateur exige que la détention soit nécessaire pour la sécurité du public, «elle n’est (donc) pas justifiée si la détention est seulement commode ou avantageuse» (R. c. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 6:58 am
(3) I know you offer course X, Y, and Z, what is student demand like for those courses? [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 11:30 am
OPM, No. 3:10-cv-1750 (D. [read post]
16 Sep 2022, 5:01 am
See, e.g., Seattle (Wash.) [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 10:49 pm
Soc'y 3, 4-7 (1986). [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 5:48 pm
See, e.g., Sturm v. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 7:56 am
E.g., 2 id. at 344, 348. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 3:54 pm
What do you do when Employer fires Employee for (allegedly discriminatory) Reason X and then, during the litigation, discovers that Employee had done something totally wrong (Reason Y; e.g., faking his resume, stealing company property, etc) that would absolutely justify firing the guy? [read post]
6 May 2022, 6:10 am
” Recognizing that the Sherman Act could be read to bar all contracts, federal courts for over a century have interpreted the 1890 antitrust law only to apply to “unreasonable” restraints of trade.[7] The Supreme Court first adopted this concept in its landmark 1911 decision in Standard Oil, upholding the lower court’s dissolution of John D. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 6:58 am
Ahora se les puede decir a aquellos que estaban tan de fiesta y tan alegres cuando se derrumbaron la URSS y el campo socialista: “¡las ideas no se matan! [read post]
