Search for: "DOES, 1-30, inclusive" Results 281 - 300 of 1,531
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 May 2022, 7:48 am by Fanny Ferdman and Delores Chichi
As amended, the law that will come into effect on November 1 will prevent fines for first-time violations if the employer corrects the problem within 30 days. [read post]
30 Apr 2022, 4:07 pm by Russell Knight
But, asking for a new trial does not make sense in a divorce trial with no jurors. [read post]
14 Apr 2022, 2:55 am by INFORRM
The case of Xanthopoulos v Rakshina [2022] EWFC 30 has hit the headlines because of the eye watering legal costs, and the excoriating judicial criticism of the parties for running them up. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 11:50 am by Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP
The SEC is seeking public comments by May 20, 2022, or 30 days after publication in the Federal Register, whichever is later. [read post]
26 Mar 2022, 6:06 pm
Both provided a full throated discursive pyrotechnics  of inclusion and exclusion in international law, and both drew the new borders of imperial primary spheres--leaving Ukraine in that ambiguous space that invited Russia to take it--if it could, and as long as it was willing to pay the price. [read post]
23 Mar 2022, 9:51 am by Janet Stewart Scalley
While not intended to be all-inclusive, this two-article series explores some of those special considerations. [read post]
23 Mar 2022, 6:01 am by Michael J. Glennon
Nor does the treaty expand the president’s war power. [read post]
22 Mar 2022, 9:14 am by Jordan Bierkos
As stipulated in the Regulations, where a contract does not specify a phased amount, the partial release of holdback payment must be made on an annual basis.[17]Prompt Payment Regulations, s. 2(1). [read post]
  But because all of the project alternatives would attain this objective, its inclusion or exclusion as an objective had no impact on the outcome, and the Court thus rejected OSENA’s challenge. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am by Public Employment Law Press
The legislature amended Civil Service Law § 167 (1) to codify the negotiated contribution rates for qualifying employees who retired after January 1, 1983, but the amendment did not change the State's contribution rates for qualifying employees who had retired before that date (see L 1983, ch 14, § 1). [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am by Public Employment Law Press
The legislature amended Civil Service Law § 167 (1) to codify the negotiated contribution rates for qualifying employees who retired after January 1, 1983, but the amendment did not change the State's contribution rates for qualifying employees who had retired before that date (see L 1983, ch 14, § 1). [read post]