Search for: "DOLE v. DOLE" Results 281 - 300 of 609
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2020, 8:39 am by Matt Ramsey
Then the Supreme Court opened patenting to anything under the sun made by man in Diamond v. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 6:40 am by Randy Barnett
” In the key case of South Dakota v. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 8:19 am by South Florida Lawyers
, but I might have went with this bon mot:For each ecstatic instantWe must an anguish payIn keen and quivering ratioTo the ectasty.For each beloved hourSharp pittances of years,Bitter contested farthingsAnd coffers heaped with tears.I don't know, maybe the Judge's reference was more on-point.Then we have Judge Huck's reference to that dreaded hip Eurobeast, international "law":In refusing to recognize the judgment, the Court applied the “international concept of due… [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 3:20 pm by Elie Mystal
[Recess Appointments] Continue reading »Follow Above the Law on Twitter or become a fan on Facebook.Tags: Alec Baldwin, Arizona, Arizona v. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 7:59 am
Not to be outdone, I spent most of that day writing a musical (and I'd like to think, poetic) version of Pinter v. [read post]
27 Nov 2014, 11:34 am
The four chapters that comprise Part V of this tome are dedicated to IP, and the pieces on Korea's "transmit rather than create" concept and the prospects of a Thai adoption of the Bayh-Dole Act are well worth a read.Bibliographic data: Publication date: December 2014. xii + 378 pp. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 11:00 pm by Apeng
(Patently-O) (IPKat) (IP Osgoode) Supreme Court clarifies ownership rights in federally funded inventions under the Bayh-Dole Act: Stanford v. [read post]