Search for: "DOMINIC v. STATE" Results 281 - 300 of 4,073
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm by Public Employment Law Press
The legislature responded by creating and enacting maps in a nontransparent manner controlled exclusively by the dominant political party — doing exactly what they would have done had the 2014 constitutional reforms never been passed. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm by Public Employment Law Press
The legislature responded by creating and enacting maps in a nontransparent manner controlled exclusively by the dominant political party — doing exactly what they would have done had the 2014 constitutional reforms never been passed. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 5:50 am by JB
A Republican dominated judiciary will likely expand on the decision’s innovations, while a Democratic dominated judiciary may read them quite narrowly. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 1:37 pm by Venkat Balasubramani
Johnson County CC Sending Politically Charged Emails Does Not Support Disturbing the Peace Conviction — State v. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 7:18 am by Amy Howe
Wednesday’s oral arguments in King v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 4:00 pm
As the United States Supreme Court noted in Packingham v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 4:00 pm
As the United States Supreme Court noted in Packingham v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 7:07 am by Conor McEvily
Monday’s decision in United States v. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 9:00 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
The state shifted from an agriculture-based economy to one dominated by mining operations and steel production during the industrial revolution. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 9:05 am by Thomas Swartz
And that such a fiduciary relationship must exhibit the characteristics of:de facto control and dominance (Marmelstein, 11 NY3d at 21).Last week the Court of Appeal was faced with another breach of fiduciary claim by a congregant  in Doe v Roman Catholic Diocese of Rochester, 2009 NY Slip Op 02264. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 3:15 am by Amy Howe
  Commentary on Lockhart v. [read post]