Search for: "Dave Hoffman" Results 281 - 300 of 350
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Nov 2019, 9:39 am by Josh Blackman
" This is a very weird blog post. https://t.co/Vjryu8TzlE — Carissa Byrne Hessick (@CBHessick) November 20, 2019 Dave Hoffman wrote, "It made more sense in its original Volokhian. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 10:27 pm
First, here’s Dave Hoffman at CoOp. [read post]
20 Jun 2010, 9:33 am by Frank Pasquale
UPDATE: Of course, co-blogger Dave Hoffman was way ahead of the trend. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 9:34 am by Ari Waldman
Admittedly, I was shocked at my commentators’ near-unanimity in support of the ban, and that’s not even including those who simply attacked the motives of their opponents and used the kind of rhetoric that Dave Hoffman advised against here. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 12:03 pm by Michael Kang
  This is just a version of the “unraveling of the market” that Dave Hoffman cited to explain why the spring cycle itself seemed to be creeping up earlier and earlier. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 6:03 am
Bartow's Definition of an Internet Bully This is a two-post combo from Dave Hoffman at Co-Op, but follows up the comments to Paul Horwitz at PrawfsBlawg. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 5:46 am
And if so, it should work in the other direction, with a video arguably favoring a defendant on a defense motion for summary judgment. 4) Dave Hoffman posts about the unique link among cultural cognition, summary judgment, and video and makes a great point that I just added to my paper: The unique problem of cultural dissensus in video cases is that more people will have seen (and, I would add, drawn conclusions about) video, meaning more people will be offended by a… [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 8:31 pm
Dave Hoffman over at Concurring Opinions had a piece last summer about Wikipedia users at major law firms changing entries to "burnish their reputations and trash their competitors. [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 12:30 pm by Dave Wieneke
All the best, Dave Wieneke Email this to a friend? [read post]
27 Aug 2007, 1:39 am
As Dave Hoffman will tell you, this is what is known as "puffery. [read post]
28 Dec 2006, 3:35 pm
  I agree with Dave Hoffman that Nifong won't succeed on any First Amendment defenses. [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 10:58 pm
Mark Draughn, Joel Rosenberg, Carolyn Elefant, Eric Turkewitz, Eugene Volokh, Orin Kerr, Dave Hoffman, Frank Pasquale, Dan Markel, Dan Solove, Ken, Ken Lammers, Anne Reed, Howard Bashman, Walter Olson, Marc John Randazza, Jim Chen, Charon, Radley Balko, Geeklawyer, Jamie Spencer, Skelly, Jon Katz, Jonathon Turley, Lyle Denniston, Douglas Berman, Scott Henson, David Lat, Niki Black and the departed Norm Pattis.I'm sure I've left some off, because I am not… [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 3:40 pm
I'll be presenting the sequel paper this Friday afternoon at the Canadian Law and Economics Association in Toronto (and I hope local Prawfs readers will get in touch with me there; I'll be hanging out with Dave Hoffman and Erik Knutsen). [read post]
13 Aug 2007, 8:44 pm
Dave Hoffman at Concurring Opinions wants to know what the big fuss is about the Duke 88. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 5:01 am by SHG
  And Hoffman is just laughing his butt off at me. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 2:48 am by SHG
  Via Ilya Somin at Volokh Conspiracy: Both Dave Hoffman and Orin Kerr have recently suggested that some of the liberal legal commentators who claimed that the individual mandate was a slam dunk case for the government were doing so for the purposes of “shaping the narrative” about the case, and may not have actually believed what they said. [read post]
27 Dec 2006, 9:48 pm
My guess is that both Dave Hoffman and my positions are being mischaracterized so that Dan can stake out a more reasonable or attractive middle position...in the service of humor and some larger point. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 9:30 am by azatty
McGhee (@Yvonne_McGhee) March 13, 2015 … which refers to this slide: A young Dustin Hoffman learns about mobile. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 7:05 pm by Michelle N. Meyer
Here’s the question I posed on one of Dave Hoffman’s Scholastica threads over at CoOps: I’m curious if you have a position on using gender, race, and the like to select invitees for symposia, conferences, and similar speaking engagements. [read post]
15 Jan 2017, 7:00 am by Daveed Gartenstein-Ross, Jacob Zenn
Bruce Hoffman’s classic work Inside Terrorism defines terrorism as an act that is “violent—or, equally important, threatens violence” (emphasis added). [read post]