Search for: "David C Thompson" Results 281 - 300 of 305
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Mar 2008, 10:54 am
We affirm.Term. of Parent-Child Rel. of S.L.H.S., and Andrew Thompson v. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 11:20 am
(c) Greatest Super Bowl ever. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 3:15 pm
FX 7.8 percent NDP Colin Carrie (C) Oshawa UOIT 5.2 percent NDP Betty Hinton (C) Kamloops-Thompson-Cariboo Thompson Rivers 8.5 percent NDP Joe Comuzzi (L) Thunder Bay-Superior North Lakehead 1.0 percent NDP … [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 5:56 am
Asked to name his most prized possession, Fred Thompson picked his: A) Winchester rifle B) Trophy wife C) Autographed picture of Ronald Reagan 3. [read post]
26 Nov 2007, 3:04 pm
The conflict prompted Dallas attorney Ben C. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 7:21 am
The Georgia cerebral palsy resource guide was assembled by United Cerebral Palsy. [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 11:01 am
Rex David Delph , an 11-page opinion, Judge Bradford writes:Appellant-Plaintiff the State of Indiana appeals from the trial court's discharge of Rex David Delph, who had been charged with two counts of murder, one count of Class A felony arson, and two counts of felony murder, pursuant to Indiana Rule of Criminal Procedure 4(C). * * * We conclude that the trial court correctly charged the State with a delay of 221 days from the date Delph was charged to the original… [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 9:30 am
The coalition--which includes Ceres, the California Public Employees' Retirement System, F&C Asset Management, and New York City Comptroller William C. [read post]
26 Jun 2007, 9:45 am
Publisher: C R C Press LLC ISBN or UPC: 1-4200-6592-0(Active Record) Format: Trade Cloth Date: Mar 2008 Price $89.95 ISBN 13: 978-1-4200-6592-3   Comparative and International Criminal Justice Author: Thompson, R. [read post]
12 Jun 2007, 11:01 am
Under Indiana Trial Rule 65(C), a party may recover fees and expenses incurred as a result of wrongful enjoinder. * * * As discussed above, the trial court erred in granting the permanent injunction against Drees, because Thompson/Estridge were not able to succeed on the merits of their claim of unreasonable interference of their ingress/egress rights. [read post]
17 Mar 2007, 6:23 pm
Cotus", who rounded-up several worthy comments on the 2d Amendment case and concluded with some observations of his own: "[C]onsidering that the 2-1 panel had to bridge several issues that they considered close . . . it is problematic to say that this result is based on the "plain language" of the constitution. [read post]