Search for: "Davis v. Jones"
Results 281 - 300
of 469
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2010, 3:45 am
That issue was determined by the Appellate Term, 9th & 10th Judicial Districts, in [Jones] v. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 4:25 pm
Peacock’s solicitors, Hodge, Jones & Allen have released a statement here. [read post]
4 Nov 2024, 1:45 am
On Tuesday 29 October, Richard Spearman KC handed down judgment on a preliminary issue in the data protection claim of Joseph Pacini, Carsten Geyer -v- Dow Jones & Company Inc [2024] EWHC 2714 (KB). [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 7:08 am
Jones to limit the third-party doctrine’s application to CLSI. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 8:29 am
Yours faithfully Solicitors David Jockelson Miles and Partners Kate Hammond Miles and partners Sarah Cove Miles and Partners Amanda Dench Miles and Partners Pauline Lloyd Ewings & Co Peggy Ray Goodman Ray Gwen Williams Goodman Ray Hilka Hollmann Goodman Ray Joanna Bosanquet Goodman Ray Michael Bourdages Goodman Ray Christina Blacklaws TV Edwards David Emmerson T V Edwards Lorraine Green TV Edwards Susan Fitzgerald TV Edwards Valerie Greenfield Fisher Meredith LLP… [read post]
11 Oct 2008, 5:21 am
Wendy Davis piles on [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 7:43 am
Hull and Peter Charles Hoffer, Roe v. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 5:44 pm
Jones, 38, of Riverside, Earl Lee Davis, 52, of Monroe, La, Nkosi Gray, 38, of New Fairfield, Conn, Billy Ray Hall, 72, of Newton, Ala, Kimberly Johnson, 41, of Chickamauga, Ga, Darryl E. [read post]
25 May 2018, 6:41 am
Oklahoma, 17-6891, and Jones v. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 1:22 pm
Azar v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 11:14 am
And he brought up Helvering v. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 8:11 am
United States, 17-6054, Jones v. [read post]
Jan. 5 - 9, 2009: US Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals Decisions [UPDATED: Links repaired on 1/31/2009]
27 Jan 2009, 6:13 pm
Kurt Jones Eastern District of Michigan at Detroit 09a0004n.06 Durham v. [read post]
Jan. 5 - 9, 2009: US Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals Decisions [UPDATED: Links repaired on 1/31/2009]
27 Jan 2009, 6:13 pm
Kurt Jones Eastern District of Michigan at Detroit 09a0004n.06 Durham v. [read post]
26 May 2016, 12:44 pm
See Davis v. [read post]
26 May 2016, 12:44 pm
See Davis v. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
Inasmuch as the Attorney General's office was not an agency involved in the FOIL request, and is without authority to grant relief requested by petitioner, the Attorney General is not a proper party herein (see Matter of Davis v Evans, 97 AD3d 857, 858 [3d Dept 2012]; Matter of Abreu v Hogan, 72 AD3d 1143, 1144 [3d Dept 2010], appeal dismissed 15 NY3d 836 [2010]). [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
Inasmuch as the Attorney General's office was not an agency involved in the FOIL request, and is without authority to grant relief requested by petitioner, the Attorney General is not a proper party herein (see Matter of Davis v Evans, 97 AD3d 857, 858 [3d Dept 2012]; Matter of Abreu v Hogan, 72 AD3d 1143, 1144 [3d Dept 2010], appeal dismissed 15 NY3d 836 [2010]). [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 6:32 am
” The cert. petitions in that case, United States v. [read post]
20 Sep 2024, 6:30 am
Cohen, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, on Sunday, September 15, 2024 Tags: Board of Directors, Fintechs, Regulations, Risks SEC Dismisses In-House Proceedings Against Accountants Following Jarkesy Posted by David Peavler and Evan Singer, Jones Day, on Monday, September 16, 2024 Tags: Rule 102(e), SEC, SEC v. [read post]
