Search for: "Davis v. United States Department of Justice"
Results 281 - 300
of 498
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Aug 2014, 5:15 am
See Davis v. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 6:45 am
See Davis v. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm
United States and Printz v. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 1:14 pm
Specifically, it concluded, the presidency is not an “office … under the United States,” and the president is not an “officer of the United States. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 6:22 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Jul 2018, 4:09 pm
Canada In the case of DEI Films v Tiwari 2018 ONSC 4423 the Ontario Superior Court of Justice dismissed a libel action under Ontario’s anti-SLAPP legislation. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 2:20 pm
City of Joliet; Davis v. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm
Department of Justice) prior to implementing changes in voting systems and rules, even systems and rules for state and local (as distinguished from congressional or presidential) elections. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 7:31 am
In The New Yorker, Lincoln Caplan weighs in on last week’s decision in Davis v. [read post]
11 Feb 2021, 9:01 pm
Department of Justice (DOJ) sent a letter to the Supreme Court amending the position the federal government was taking in California v. [read post]
16 May 2019, 7:55 am
United States, 18-7096. [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:37 am
These allegations are consistent with the Department of Justice’s court filings in Cohen’s federal criminal case. [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 4:09 pm
Mr Justice Warby said the “offensive and wrong” allegation had caused “real anger and distress”. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 12:28 am
The Vale of Glamorgan Council v The Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice [2011] EWHC 1532 (Admin) (16 June 2011): Council fails in challenge to closure if Barry Magistrates Court in Wales – wider victory for court closures plans. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 11:54 am
Many courts, including the United States Supreme Court, have recognized a private cause of action for violation of NASD and NYSE Rules, including a private cause of action for andldquo;the failure to supervise.andrdquo;andnbsp; See, e.g., Cook v. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 8:28 am
It would also allow diplomats and Taiwanese military to display their flag and wear their uniforms while in the United States on official businesses. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 4:37 pm
Justice Lee stated that the evidence may change the outcome of the case and extends beyond Lehrmann’s credibility. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 3:58 am
Justice Department’s request that the Supreme Court consider sanctions against lawyers who advocated for an immigrant teenager at the center of an abortion case [, Hargan v. [read post]
14 Mar 2021, 9:03 pm
Miller, Arizona State University Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law McGirt v. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 4:07 am
In Davis v. [read post]
