Search for: "Day v. Commissioner of Correction"
Results 281 - 300
of 648
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2017, 4:15 pm
The basis of the order requiring Facebook to identify TVO was the decision of the House of Lords in Norwich Pharmacal Co v Customs and Excise Commissioners [1974] AC 133, [1973] UKHL 6 (26 June 1973); but it “is a power which for good reasons must be sparingly used” (Megaleasing v Barrett (No 2) [1993] ILRM 497, 503 (Finlay CJ). [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 5:57 am
Trevizo v. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 4:03 pm
On the same day Macfarlane LJ refused permission to appeal in the long running application in the case of Lokhova v Tymula. [read post]
30 May 2017, 3:26 am
On the same day Jay J granted a harassment injunction to three judges in the case of Foskett v Kinsley. [read post]
3 May 2017, 5:02 am
Here, for instance, is a letter that led the court in Correctional Medical Care, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 2:32 pm
Sierra Club, et al. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 5:56 pm
This category seeks to address the facts at issue in Kerry v. [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 5:03 pm
The same blog also notes the refusal of the Court of Appeal to grant permission to appeal in the case of Craven v Information Commissioner & DECC, permission to appeal. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 6:53 pm
The Commissioners originally were to severely limit the number of licensed weed dispensaries. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 6:53 pm
The Commissioners originally were to severely limit the number of licensed weed dispensaries. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 7:00 am
In the closing days of the January term, the Court unanimously held that a police officer had waived any right he might otherwise have had to arbitrate his termination, affirming the Appellate Court in Village of Bartonville v. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 10:08 am
Prosecutors do not correct the record. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 2:28 am
On appeal from: [2014] EWCA Civ 3 This appeal considered whether the Court of Appeal was correct to hold that the appellants’ arrests and detention on the day of the Royal Wedding to prevent breaches of the peace were lawful under ECHR, art 5(1)(c) or alternatively under art 5(1)(b). [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 5:54 am
He sues the Department of Corrections over his 22 straight years of solitary confinement. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 4:06 pm
On the same day Sir David Eady handed down judgment in the case of Daryanani v Ramnani ([2017] EWHC 183 (QB)). [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 2:05 pm
An appellate panel of the Commission affirmed the single commissioner’s order. [read post]
5 Feb 2017, 2:05 pm
An appellate panel of the Commission affirmed the single commissioner’s order. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 7:00 pm
See also, Day v. [read post]
20 Jan 2017, 3:32 am
The data fingerprint in the Privacy Commissioner v Telstra case was the IP address of the device visiting websites or creating the location data. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 3:55 pm
Disclosure documents that are materially inaccurate or incomplete must be corrected promptly, and the corrected version must be distributed promptly to pool participants. [read post]
