Search for: "Defendants A-M" Results 281 - 300 of 38,215
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Aug 2024, 9:37 am by Eric Goldman
Instead of suing the defendant on content moderation decisions, plaintiffs can sue on what the defendants said about their content moderation decisions. [read post]
23 Aug 2024, 7:50 am by Guest Contributor
 But the stay requests keep piling up, and one skeptic, Justice Kagan, has concluded that the “Court’s shadow-docket decisionmaking … every day becomes more unreasoned, inconsistent, and impossible to defend. [read post]
22 Aug 2024, 10:02 am by Eugene Volokh
And it's a—I'm trying to give you things that you've never heard before, and this is true. [read post]
22 Aug 2024, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
  Judge Kuhl thus found many of the claims to lie outside the coverage of the First Amendment because “[t]he allegedly addictive and harmful features of Defendants’ platforms are alleged to work regardless of the third-party content viewed by the users. [read post]
22 Aug 2024, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
In any case, though, it strikes me as unconstitutionally overbroad: Even if there's some compelling interest in keeping references to the minor out of the public eye (and I'm skeptical about that), the last two items strike me as very hard to defend. [read post]
Later, the status of Qazpatent as a defendant was reclassified as a third party without independent claims. [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 10:28 pm
I'm somewhat on board with the result the Court of Appeal reaches in this case, which affirms the denial of an attorney disqualification motion by the trial court. [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 4:36 pm
My fellow Democrats, my fellow Americans, nearly four years ago in winter, on the steps of the Capitol on a cold January day, I raised my right hand, and I swore an oath to you and to God to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution and to faithfully execute the office of the president of the United States. [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 7:58 am by Phil Dixon
Upon entering the room, unprompted, he stated, “I’m good at what I do, and I’m connected to the Sinaloa Cartel. [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 6:24 am by Daniel J. Gilman
The plaintiff is not required to show that but for the defendant’s exclusionary conduct the anticompetitive effects would not have followed. [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 5:00 am
  The Court's companion Order can be viewed HERE.I send thanks to Attorney James M. [read post]
19 Aug 2024, 5:01 pm by Aaron Moss
I’m not saying—I’m saying I understand Defendant’s position in taking that argument. [read post]