Search for: "Democratic Party v. Board of Elections"
Results 281 - 300
of 595
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jul 2018, 6:59 am
Thapar argued for a rule under which the lower court would be reversed only if it committed plain error, even when neither party asks for that highly deferential standard to apply. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm
Now, that is all wiped out and replaced by a clearer and more depressing picture of the man’s lifetime of work.In the short time since his announcement, we have learned that Kennedy allowed himself to be wheedled into retirement by a White House that warned him that, as a New York Times report put it, “[t]here was no telling … what would happen if Democrats gained control of the Senate after the November elections and had the power to block the president’s… [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 7:25 am
Supreme Court issued its highly anticipated decision in Janus v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 2:48 pm
Bush was elected and worked in the West Wing for five years, first as a counsel to the president and then as staff secretary to the president. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 9:01 am
To understand how we got to Janus v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 5:39 pm
(likely relisted after June 21 conference) Franchise Tax Board of California v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 11:54 am
Dragnea served as the leader of Romania’s Social Democratic Party and is considered to be among the country’s most powerful politicians. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 2:05 pm
Whitford and Benisek v. [read post]
15 May 2018, 11:25 am
Federal Election Commission. [read post]
6 May 2018, 8:35 pm
The case, Trump v. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 5:00 am
NAFTA negotiations are currently operating on a “political calendar”: The Trump administration worries that a delayed deal could stall if Democrats win control of one or both houses in Congress in November or Mexico, as is expected, elects a more liberal president in December. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 5:53 am
” While the effect of the cap impacts high-tax states (many of which, but not all, tend to vote Democratic), the burdens of the cap are a result of income, property ownership, and the interplay of the tax system, and are indifferent to one’s state of residence or party affiliation. [20] Additionally, even in the presence of a classification, the provision would still be valid. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 4:06 am
Board of Education after the first hearing, so put it off until the next term. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 12:01 pm
” Or, after Lee v. [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 5:27 am
It is available in at many countries including liberal democratic countries such as Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Norway Portugal, Sweden, Spain, UK, Mexico, Australia, and Singapore. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 4:32 am
” The editorial board of The Baltimore Sun argues that the case offers the court “an important opportunity to uphold the Constitution’s promise that the House (and by implication, state legislative bodies) reflect the changing will of the people, not the interests of incumbents or whatever party is in power when the lines are drawn. [read post]
25 Mar 2018, 4:25 pm
Permission was refused in the cases of Rotenberg v Times Newspapers and Mionis v Democratic Press S.A. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 9:32 am
Matthew Kahn shared the full audio of oral argument in Al-Alwi v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 11:02 am
Board of Education or how we got to Obergefell v. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 4:13 am
At Slate, Richard Hasen argues that “[t]he solution here is for state officials to train election workers to recognize political statements and apply the ban evenhandedly,” and that “[i]f there is any evidence of viewpoint discrimination—say against Tea Party messages at Democratic-leaning polling places—then it would be time to bring a new lawsuit challenging the law as applied on the ground. [read post]
