Search for: "Diaz v. United States" Results 281 - 300 of 627
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 May 2011, 2:10 pm
Zeininger´s defense argued that the Constitution´s Sixth Amendment gives people the right to cross-examine the witnesses against them and also referred to a United States Supreme Court case, Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 10:00 pm
In Melendez-Diaz, for example, the United States Supreme Court held that certificate of drug analyses, prepared by chemists when testing whether a particular item is a controlled substance, are testimonial in nature and, in order to be admissible, the drug lab experts should be called to testify. [read post]
24 May 2011, 7:34 am by Aaron Pelley
” http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/839921.opn.pdf State v. [read post]
20 May 2011, 7:42 pm by axd10
Internationalism and Where United States Courts Should Find International Law. 24 Penn St. [read post]
18 May 2011, 3:35 am
Supreme Court (SCOTUS, among the legal profession,) issued a landmark decision in the area of testimonial evidence in drug prosecutions, Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 6:59 pm by Dwight Sullivan
Here’s audio of today’s CAAF argument in United States v. [read post]
15 May 2011, 12:23 am by Dwight Sullivan
  Here are the granted issues in Sweeney: WHETHER, IN LIGHT OF THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT’S RULING IN MELENDEZ-DIAZ v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 1:26 pm by Richard D. Friedman
Further proof that the death of Crawford has been greatly exaggerated comes in the form of a recent decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 10:16 am by clayton
Diaz reached into the defendant’s pocket and retrieved the item, which Diaz estimated to be approximately four grams of crack cocaine. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 6:19 pm by Viking
State, the Alabama Supreme Court had this to say: In answering this question in the negative, this Court finds persuasive the rational and holding in United States v. [read post]