Search for: "Doe Governmental Agencies 1-5"
Results 281 - 300
of 1,144
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jun 2017, 11:49 am
And what does Monty Python have to do with it? [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 2:47 pm
The Rule requires the insertion of standard contract clause 52.203-16, Preventing Personal Conflicts of Interest, in solicitations, contracts, and task or delivery orders awarded after December 2, 2011 for “acquisition functions closely associated with inherently governmental functions for, or on behalf of, a Federal agency or department. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 12:36 pm
The Rule requires the insertion of standard contract clause 52.203-16, Preventing Personal Conflicts of Interest, in solicitations, contracts, and task or delivery orders awarded after December 2, 2011 for “acquisition functions closely associated with inherently governmental functions for, or on behalf of, a Federal agency or department. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 7:35 am
Corporate law is grounded on agency principles articulated through our notions of "fiduciary duty." [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 9:34 pm
As nightfall does not come all at once, neither does oppression. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 11:31 am
Accordingly, I hereby order: Section 1. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 3:51 am
(h) Section 7(p)(1) does not prevent a public agency from prohibiting or restricting outside employment by its employees. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:34 am
(b) The filing of a petition under section 301, 302, or 303 of this title, or of an application under section 5(a)(3) of the Securities Investor Protection Act of 1970, does not operate as a stay—(1) under subsection (a) of this section, of the commencement or continuation of a criminal action or proceeding against the debtor;(2) under subsection (a)—(A) of the commencement or continuation of a civil action or proceeding—(i) for the establishment of… [read post]
14 Oct 2012, 3:36 pm
However, governmental agencies such as the police, the FBI, and prosecutors will still be able to see your record after it is “sealed. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 5:23 pm
Thus, Civil Rights Law § 79 (1) does not apply to him. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 2:38 pm
Designated Person Rules Rule 1. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 11:21 am
Develop alliances and partnerships with industry, governmental and nonprofit players. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 2:24 am
It is not necessary for a trademark to be registered by a governmental authority or agency for such rights to exist, SeekAmerica Networks Inc. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 10:46 am
Public Agencies Opposed to Soc. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 7:24 am
Code §§ 34-13-3.5-5, 34-13-3.5-6. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 2:19 pm
Telher failed to prove all the elements: (1) while he is a public employee; (2) who acted in good faith in making a report; (3) that involved a violation of law; (4) the report was NOT made to an appropriate law enforcement authority; and (5) even though he suffered retaliation as a result of making the report, the Texas Supreme Court held he was not entitled to relief. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 10:52 am
[x] In reaching that conclusion, the court examined the historical and central significance of the constitutional jury-trial right, finding it to be “one of our most vital barriers to governmental arbitrariness. [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 12:46 am
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which includes the name of the person vaccinated, the type of vaccine provided and date of last dose administered, or similar documentation issued by a foreign governmental agency; (2) a photo of a vaccination card (both sides), which complies with the requirements for a CDC-issued vaccination card. [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 9:59 am
Tuesday, June 15, 2021, at 1 p.m.: The Brookings Institution will host a panel discussing Kathryn Stoner’s new book, “Russia Resurrected: Its Purpose and Power in a New Global Order,” which analyzes Russia’s role on the global stage. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 6:11 am
It begins by noting that “[t]he question occasionally arises as to the governmental levels at which the UKUSA COMINT Agreement was authorized or approved” but quickly clarifies that “the President of the United States authorized an agreement in this field, and that the British Foreign Minister must have been aware of it. [read post]
