Search for: "Doe et al v. Harris et al"
Results 281 - 300
of 308
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2008, 3:07 pm
Jane Doe, et al. [read post]
30 Aug 2008, 5:06 pm
HUDSPETH COUNTY UNDERGROUND WATER CONSERVATIONDISTRICT NO. 1, ET AL.; from Hudspeth County; 8th district(08-04-00296-CV & 08-05-00115-CV, 209 SW3d 172, 08-31-06)3 motions for rehearingjudgment issued March 30, 2008, withdrawncorrected judgment issuedSupplemental Per Curiam OpinionBrookshire Grocery v. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) CAFC decides Apotex and Impax infringed AstraZeneca’s Prilosec patents: (Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (GenericsWeb), CAFC upholds lower court’s decision finding USPTO was within its rights to subject a Cooper patent to… [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 6:16 pm
Harris v. [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 1:50 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: The end of William Patry’s blog: (Patry Copyright Blog), (Excess Copyright), (Patently-O), (Chicago IP Litigation Blog), (Michael Geist), (The Fire of Genius), (Techdirt), (Patry Copyright Blog), Kitchin J clarifies scope of biotech patents, in particular gene sequence patents: Eli Lilly & Co v Human Genome Sciences:… [read post]
13 Jul 2008, 2:05 pm
Harry A. [read post]
13 Jul 2008, 1:56 pm
Harry A. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 1:00 pm
Harris County Appraisal District, et al., decided this past April. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 6:01 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) Sherman Harris v. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 1:19 pm
” Wichita County v. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 4:23 pm
” • Although studies have shown modest reductions in some vitamins and other nutrients after pasteurization of milk, these changes are insignificant according to a review by Potter et al (1984), human nutrition studies have shown no advantage of raw over pasteurized milk. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 8:57 am
For a longer more empirical analysis of the video in the case, see Kahan et al. here. [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
Landmark IP implications for universities: University of Western Australia v Gray: (IPRoo), (Managing Intellectual Property), (The Age), The latest edition of US Trade Representative’s ‘Special 301 Report’: (Ars Technica), (Ars Technica), (IAM), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Patry Copyright Blog), (Managing Intellectual Property), (Patent Docs), (IP Law360), Court rejects RIAA ‘making available’ theory: Atlantic v Howell:… [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 7:00 am
Harris County Appraisal District, et al., decided by the First District Court of Appeals in Houston on April 17th, involved what appears to be a recurring issue for Houston area property owners. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:00 am
Protecting computer programs under the Copyright Act: Dais Studios v Bullet Creative: (IP Down Under), Assessing copyright risk in new classroom technologies: (IP Down Under), Cadbury loses battle over exclusive use of colour purple for chocolate wrapping in its case against Darrell Lea: (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog), (IP Down Under), (IPKat), (IPwar’s), Employee or independent contractor? [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 10:59 am
Lemmon, et al v. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 10:54 am
For publication opinions today (4): In Sally Gibbs, et al v. [read post]
15 Mar 2008, 7:00 am
Shame about the IP: (Afro-IP),Ethiopia receives US trade mark for Sidamo coffee despite opposition from Starbucks: (The IP Factor), (Afro-IP),CC licensed test for African sleeping sickness: (creativecommons.org),Update on PCT applications filed in Nigeria: (Afro-IP),Parallel imports of DVDs to be tested in South Africa: Universal City Studios v Mr Video: (Afro-IP),The W****D C*P of 2*1*: FIFA’s intellectual property rights in South Africa: (Afro-IP),Namibia to adopt… [read post]
28 Jan 2008, 10:57 am
Harris County, Texas, et al. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 1:23 pm
In a longitudinal study that followed 4,724 known sex offenders over a period of 15 years, 24% were charged with, or convicted of, a new sexual offense (Harris & Hanson, 2004). [read post]
