Search for: "Doe v. Sullivan" Results 281 - 300 of 1,707
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
No effective date is specified, presumably because the Policy Statement does not purport to be a regulation,[4] but institutions should assume it is effective immediately. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 4:32 am
Kerson Co. v Shayne, Dachs, Weiss, Kolbrenner, Levy & Levine, 45 NY2d 730, 732; Tortura v Sullivan Papain Block McGrath & Cannavo, 21 AD3d 1082, 1083; Rau v Borenkoff, 262 AD2d 388, 389; Lattimore v Bergman, 224 AD2d 497). [read post]
17 May 2023, 6:19 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
That exception does not apply in this case, the Court says, because it does not address "what the declarant merely conjectures. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 10:53 am
In a recent prebid protest presented by our firm, Payne Hackenbracht & Sullivan, the United States Court of Federal Claims considered the protest of Weeks Marine, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
The addition of the policy statement is driven in part by the OCC’s determination that the Comptroller’s Licensing Manual does not adequately describe “all of the OCC’s considerations regarding the BMA statutory factors and its related processes such as considerations for holding public meetings. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 6:03 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
" That skepticism does now show the planners were digging its heals and making it clear that it would deny all variances. [read post]
20 Jun 2022, 6:40 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
That analysis does not satisfy the Court of Appeals (Lohier, Sullivan and Lee), which reminds us about "arguable probable cause," which allows the police to win qualified immunity when a reasonable officer mistakenly thinks the suspect committed a crime. [read post]