Search for: "Does 1 through 3" Results 281 - 300 of 42,778
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
On May 3, 2024, the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Council issued an Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPR) regarding the prohibition on semiconductors produced by certain Chinese manufacturers, enacted in Section 5949(a)(1) of the James M. [read post]
8 May 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
-linked assets held outside the United States that would clear through the U.S. financial system. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:04 pm by Béligh Elbalti
” Former article 3 of the Law also defined the scope of application of the Law and limited only to “foreigners” in the meaning of article 1 (i.e. non-Muslim foreigners). [read post]
8 May 2024, 4:38 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Specific reasons underlying the finding of necessity: Amendment of these regulations needs to proceed on an emergency basis because United University Professions ratified the July 2, 2022 through July 1, 2026 collective bargaining agreement on August 24, 2023 and the changes need to be implemented as soon as possible. [read post]
8 May 2024, 4:38 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Specific reasons underlying the finding of necessity: Amendment of these regulations needs to proceed on an emergency basis because United University Professions ratified the July 2, 2022 through July 1, 2026 collective bargaining agreement on August 24, 2023 and the changes need to be implemented as soon as possible. [read post]
8 May 2024, 2:26 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  In general, retirement income is secured through three sources: social security, retirement savings in qualified plans, and personal assets/investments held outside of qualified plans. [read post]
8 May 2024, 2:24 pm by Guest Author
The court first acknowledged that deference would be appropriate under steps one through three. [read post]
8 May 2024, 12:05 pm by Mark Weidemaier
Some time ago, Mitu and I had an exchange (here are parts 1, 2, 3, and 4) about judgments and collective action clauses (CACs). [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The G&T programs, plaintiffs allege[*3], provide superior academic preparation, which allows primarily white and Asian students to continue through the pipeline to academically screened middle and high schools, relegating Black and Latinx students to unscreened schools, often in poorly maintained buildings with limited extracurricular programs. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The G&T programs, plaintiffs allege[*3], provide superior academic preparation, which allows primarily white and Asian students to continue through the pipeline to academically screened middle and high schools, relegating Black and Latinx students to unscreened schools, often in poorly maintained buildings with limited extracurricular programs. [read post]
8 May 2024, 5:17 am by Jan von Hein
Since the Romanian Government does not give any reason why recognition should not be granted, there should be no obstacle to automatic recognition. [read post]
7 May 2024, 1:11 pm by Evan Brown
Why TikTok thinks the law is unconstitutional Plaintiffs provide four grounds on which they believe the law is unconstitutional: (1) the First Amendment, (2) Article 1’s prohibition of bills of attainder, (3) the Equal Protection Clause of the Fifth Amendment, and (4) the Takings Clauses of the Fifth Amendment First Amendment: Plaintiffs assert that the law significantly limits their First Amendment rights, impacting both the company and the free speech rights of… [read post]
7 May 2024, 1:11 pm by Evan Brown
Why TikTok thinks the law is unconstitutional Petitioners provide four grounds on which they believe the law is unconstitutional: (1) the First Amendment, (2) Article 1’s prohibition of bills of attainder, (3) the Equal Protection Clause of the Fifth Amendment, and (4) the Takings Clauses of the Fifth Amendment First Amendment: Petitioners assert that the law significantly limits their First Amendment rights, impacting both the company and the free speech rights of… [read post]
 Here, the question is raised whether the requirements of the LPA Sections violate cannabis employees Section 7 rights of being able to choose or refrain from choosing a bargaining representative as the LPA Sections require licensees and applicants for licensure to enter into agreements with bona fide labor organizations, but does not require those labor organizations to be one of the employees’ choosing or to be certified through the National Labor Relations… [read post]
7 May 2024, 9:31 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
” Thomas does not mourn the loss of his job, nor does he look for a similar position at another banking and finance law firm. [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:45 am by Guest Contributor
And importantly, the case survey does not indicate that the risk of federal preemption has increased. [read post]