Search for: "Does 1 to 20" Results 281 - 300 of 28,605
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Sep 2021, 11:17 am by David J. Halberg, Esq.
However, it does reflect how a punitive damage award can substantially increase the amount one is compensated. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 5:36 am
Does that 20-employee minimum apply to states (and their political subdivisions, agencies, and instrumentalities)? [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 9:44 am by Paula Urban
Another Apgar test may be given at 10, 15, and 20 minutes if the score is low. [read post]
23 May 2022, 5:13 am by Rose Hughes
  Were the decisions in T 1024/1, T 2766/17, T 2293/18 and T 0121/20 to be the final nails in the coffin of a description amendment rethink? [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 12:21 pm
I have filmed about 20 so far (but not all are posted yet). [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 6:09 am by Shari Shapiro
  What if the return on that technology was $400:$1--for every $1 of government program money spent, the return in cost savings was $400? [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 10:10 am by Jon Sands
Basher, No. 09-30311 (1-20-11) (Mills, Sr. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 11:38 am
On Thursday, August 20, 2009, the Michigan Supreme Court  granted a motion for reconsideration in McCormick v. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 1:16 am by Rose Hughes
There is growing consensus from recent Boards of Appeal that G1/21 does not endorse the imposition of ViCo oral proceedings, absent a state of general emergency (T 1501/20). [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 7:25 am by JP Sarmiento
Upon providing all the necessary documentation, your immigration advisor should issue you a new I-20 with a reinstatement endorsement. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 5:15 am
February 20, 2008): Second, even if the treaty applies to this case, a defendant charged under MLEA "does not have standing to raise a claim of failure to comply with international law as a basis for a defense," and such a failure "does not divest a court of jurisdiction. [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 10:01 pm
LEXIS 21 (January 20, 2010): According to defendant, Bingman stands for the proposition that, first, the automobile exception requires probable cause to believe that a crime, not a mere violation, has occurred, and second, that a strong odor cannot by itself form the basis for an objectively reasonable belief that an automobile contains more than an ounce of marijuana. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 2:05 pm
That is scary given that Bob bradley will make sure Micheal and Mo sit back.Although I won't happen, with this roster, I would try running a 4-1-4-1 formation that would look like this:--------------Ching------------------Beasely--Bradley---Donovan---Klejstan-------------Edu---------------------Hejduk--Bocanegra--Onyewu----Wynne----------------Howard------------------What does this get you? [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 11:05 am
Another would be to offer a slightly "less skinny" plan that does cover in-hospital charges in a way that satisfies Our Betters in DC©. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 2:10 am by Roel van Woudenberg
Case Law Book (2019) I.D.3.1 "Determination of closest prior art in general",  3.2 "Same purpose or effect" and 3.4 "Most promising starting point"), nor does the Board comment on its deviations from the quite clear guidance in Guidelines G-VII, 5.1 (despite Article 20(2) RPBA 2007).Summary of Facts and SubmissionsI. [read post]
26 Sep 2007, 4:05 am
Here, the presumption does not apply to defendant's sister who lived in the same house with him. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 7:52 am
In the Supreme Court category, why does Scalia outrank Thomas, why does Roberts come in only third, and why does Alito get no respect? [read post]