Search for: "Does 1-24" Results 281 - 300 of 16,478
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
  Among other significant differences from 889(a)(1)(A),which went into effect on August 13, 2019, the Section 889(a)(1)(B) prohibition is not a mandatory flowdown; does not include an exception for contractors’ use of backhaul and roaming features that include covered telecommunications equipment; and has more extensive waiver request requirements. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 7:00 pm by Sme
Colvin (10th Cir., September 24, 2015) (reversing district court affirmation of the ALJ’s denial of social security benefits to Trujillo)  *Vigil v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 10:08 pm
The researchers utilized over 24 years of data from more than 1 million teens from the 48 contiguous states in the continental United States. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 10:40 am
In time for Easter, 1/2 issues an upub decision here about appellate resurrection regarding an important appellate procedure issue pending at the Supreme Court, which begins:Plaintiffs and appellants [] appeal from a trial court order determining a settlement was in good faith. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 1:39 am by Simon Holzer
The plaintiff claimed that EP 1 200 092 does not have a valid priority and, therefore, lacks novelty in light of the international application WO 01/08686. [read post]
2 May 2024, 10:39 am
  AJP Educational Foundation, Inc. a/k/a American Muslims for Palestine and National Students for Justice in Palestine Case 1:24-cv-00724 US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (Filed 05/01/24). [read post]
” The executive order does NOT apply to anyone who is in the United States as of the effective date of the order (12:01 a.m. eastern daylight time on June 24, 2020) The order does NOT apply to anyone who has a valid nonimmigrant visa as of the effective date. [read post]
The post Money Doesn’t Buy Happiness, but Maybe Volunteering Does appeared first on HR Daily Advisor. [read post]
15 May 2017, 2:32 am by Romano Beitsma
The appellant's final request is that the decision under appeal be set aside and that a patent be granted on the basis of the following application documents:- description pages 1, 2, and 4 to 13 as originally filed, and pages 3, 3a and 3b as filed with the letter dated 24 February 2017;- drawings of Figures 1 to 8 as originally filed;- claims 1 to 3 of the sole request maintained at the oral proceedings before the Board, corresponding to the fourth auxiliary… [read post]