Search for: "Does 1-30 defendants" Results 281 - 300 of 7,891
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jan 2008, 2:42 am
The Maryland Court of Special Appeals found in a 2-1 decision last month that a reduction of 30 percent in the survival chances of a woman with uterine cancer as the result of medical malpractice is not actionable as a matter of Maryland law. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 8:49 am by Dave Maass
Hundreds of inmates received extended stints in solitary confinement over social network use, including two inmates who were sentenced to more than 30 years in solitary for accessing Facebook. [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 5:53 pm by INFORRM
On Monday 30 June 2014, Mr Justice Saunders heard mitigation on behalf the four defendants who had pleaded guilty. [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 5:00 am by Law Office of W.F. "Casey" Ebsary Jr
            In order to establish constructive possession of a controlled substance if the controlled substance is in a place over which the (defendant) does not have control, the State must prove the (defendant’s) (1) control over the controlled substance and (2) knowledge that the controlled substance was within the (defendant’s) presence. [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 5:00 am by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
            In order to establish constructive possession of a controlled substance if the controlled substance is in a place over which the (defendant) does not have control, the State must prove the (defendant’s) (1) control over the controlled substance and (2) knowledge that the controlled substance was within the (defendant’s) presence. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 2:08 pm by Ashley Deeks
Does Maliki have a valid constitutional claim, and, if he does, how is that claim likely to play out? [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 8:06 am by Randall Hodgkinson
Edgar, 281 Kan. 30, 36, 127 P.3d 986 (2006): (1) whether the defendant was represented by competent counsel, (2) whether the defendant was misled, coerced, mistreated, or unfairly taken advantage of, and (3) whether the plea was fairly and understandingly made.The KSC provided guidance for the application of these factors in presentence withdrawal requests:The Edgar factors remain viable benchmarks for judicial discretion but reliance on them to the exclusion of… [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 8:25 am by Ilya Somin
Texas,” 1:30-3:15 PM: This panel focuses on the Supreme Court’s important decision on affirmative action in higher education in Fisher v. [read post]
31 Mar 2022, 4:37 am by Krzysztof Pacula
A defendant who does not lodge a statement of opposition within that 30-day time limit may, in a number of exceptional cases, apply for a review of the order pursuant to Article 20 of the Regulation. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 8:52 am
Springer notified the school administrators and called the police.Henry County Sheriff's Deputy Joseph Femali arrived at Orion around 12:30 p.m. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 1:42 am
The notice of appeal must be filed: (1) within 30 days after the day sentence is imposed or suspended in open court, or after the day the trial court enters an appealable order; or (2) within 90 days after the day sentence is imposed or suspended in open court if the defendant timely files a motion for new trial. 30 days from sentencing A plea of guilty, or a guilty verdict from a judge or jury alone does not start the deadline for… [read post]
26 Mar 2021, 6:25 pm by Randall Hodgkinson
Subsections (d), (e)(1), and (e)(2) contain similar provisions if a defendant's failure to appear or competency matters delay the trial. [read post]
19 Jul 2021, 6:19 am by John Jascob
The derivative plaintiffs/defendants, however, countered that: (1) whatever duties they owed were owed to fellow shareholders and not to Optimis; (2) in the derivative suit context, Delaware imposes no duty beyond the maintenance of the derivative suit; and (3) Delaware does not recognize a claim for money damages for a derivative suit plaintiff’s breach of fiduciary duty.The Chancery Court rejected the derivative plaintiffs/defendants’ arguments… [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 8:50 am by John Elwood
  One swallow does not a summer make, but with apologies to Aristotle, Cervantes, and suchlike paragons of the Western Literary Tradition, a dozen hirundines in a row may at least suggest a warming trend. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 9:45 pm
They file it more than the statutorily-required 75 days before the hearing date, but (1) forget to add 5 days for service by mail, and (2) impermissibly set the hearing for 18 days before trial (whereas the statute requires 30 absent a showing of good cause).Plaintiff waits the full period to respond (rather than moving ex parte to take the motion off calendar) and then raises purely procedural/notice objections, and does not respond on the merits. [read post]