Search for: "Does v. Barry" Results 281 - 300 of 868
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Oct 2007, 1:31 pm
Barry Barnett Yes, our feed does have the 411. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 6:10 am
US could be endangered by US v. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 3:50 am by SHG
Does this make her Supreme Court worthy? [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 10:00 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Whether petitioner intends to publish the information on a publicly available website is irrelevant to the applicability of the exemption since "access to government records does not depend on the purpose for which the records are sought" (Matter of Gould v New York City Police Dept., 89 NY2d 267, 274 [1996]; see also Matter of Bellamy v New York City Police Dept., 59 AD3d 353, 355 [1st Dept 2009]). [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 10:00 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Whether petitioner intends to publish the information on a publicly available website is irrelevant to the applicability of the exemption since "access to government records does not depend on the purpose for which the records are sought" (Matter of Gould v New York City Police Dept., 89 NY2d 267, 274 [1996]; see also Matter of Bellamy v New York City Police Dept., 59 AD3d 353, 355 [1st Dept 2009]). [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 8:46 pm
Obama (PDF)Link: Motion for TRO in Berg v. [read post]
11 Dec 2016, 5:00 am by Barry Sookman
Equustek in the SCC – Webcast Live December 6, 2016 at 9:30 AM ET https://t.co/hsQLadCTlS -> Australian creators launch campaign against proposed copyright reform https://t.co/p5LabApkIb -> Latest news | US to hold public meeting on copyright marketplace https://t.co/fadun1fwO1 -> Free speech vs. copyright in Supreme Court battle between Google and B.C. firm https://t.co/QZKlXgxd1l -> Delhi HC reserves verdict on publishers’ appeal in photocopy case https://t.co/EgIr4CkRjN… [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 6:38 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
That does define hearsay, but people may not realize that even explosive hearsay is suspect because you cannot cross-examine it. [read post]