Search for: "Dolan v. State" Results 281 - 300 of 368
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
 That decision came in June of 2015, with the ruling in California Building Industry Association (CBIA) v. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 8:05 am by John Elwood
Johns River Water Management District, Dolan v. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 10:56 am by Erin Miller
UPDATE, Jan. 7: Today United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2016, 5:48 pm by Bernadette Duran-Brown
 (1987) 483 U.S. 825, and whether the dedication requirement is “roughly proportional” to the impact of the proposed development, as set forth in Dolan v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 6:37 am by Conor McEvily
  At the Wall Street Journal (subscription required), Jess Bravin covers Reichle v. [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 6:56 am
California Coastal Commission and Dolan v. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 7:40 pm by cdw
” [via Lexisone] Dolan Darling v. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 8:25 am by Edward Foley
Senate seat with less than a third of the votes, 32.2%, beating among other candidates non-denialist Matt Dolan (who came in third with 23.3%). [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:10 pm
Welfare, No. 06-4628 In an employment-discrimination suit against a state agency, denial of a motion to dismiss is reversed where: 1) by voluntarily removing the matter from state to federal court, the state had waived its Eleventh Amendment immunity from suit in a federal forum; but 2) a removing state retains all defenses it would have enjoyed had the matter been litigated in state court, including immunity from liability. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 10:00 pm by Jim Sedor
She has said she would not vote to confirm a nominee who was hostile to Roe v. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm by Joshua Burd
Supreme Court’s Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
17 May 2020, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
Simon Dolan said he received an unsatisfactory response to his challenge over the legality of the lockdown in a “letter before action” sent two weeks ago and his lawyers intend to go to the high court to seek permission for an urgent judicial review of the background to the lockdown imposed on 23 March. [read post]