Search for: "Dow v. Jones"
Results 281 - 300
of 343
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
Nail v. [read post]
5 Dec 2021, 6:16 pm
On February 27, 2020, a week after Wayfair management presented the optimistic forecast to the board, the Dow Jones Industrial Average suffered its largest ever one-day decline and Wayfair’s stock price fell from over $72.50 per share on February 24, 2020 to $23.52 per share on March 19, 2020. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 4:32 pm
The Human Rights Commission also announces — rather triumphantly, I think — that it does not matter that Encyclopedia Dramatica is hosted and written in the United States, because Australian law, as reflected in Dow Jones v. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 10:20 am
In fixed index annuities the insurance company credits the purchaser with a return that is based on the performance of a securities index, such as the Dow Jones Industrial Average. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 6:06 am
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 3:11 pm
As reported by the Dow Jones Newswire, Pallante stated that "The first issue is really, is mass digitization a national goal that Congress feels legislation is warranted for, and if so, for what beneficiaries. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 1:10 pm
Of particular significance was that XTO was a relatively large public company that had outperformed its peers in the S&P 500 Index and the Dow Jones U.S. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 9:12 am
On March 2, 2020, the Dow Jones Industrial Average rose by over 1,294 points, the S&P 500 rose by over 136 points, and the Nasdaq rose by 384 points. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 12:33 am
There was also a strike out application in the case of Vince v Associated Newspapers Limited. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 5:04 pm
On 7-8 March 2024, there was a hearing in the data protection case of Lynch v Serious Fraud Office KB-2024-000237. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 5:01 am
Finance, Dow Jones Industrial Average (^DJI) [Historical], https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/%5EDJI/history. [5] Others have of course noted the danger that opinions might be lumped together with true false statements of fact. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 9:04 am
So too, there is the very real potential for trivial claims to be struck under Dow Jones & Co Inc v Jameel [2005] EWCA Civ 75, [2005] QB 946 for abuse of process. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 6:00 am
In addition to the “threshold of seriousness”, the court can be asked to decide whether there is a “real and substantial tort” and, if there is not, to strike the claim out as an abuse: Jameel v Dow Jones [2005] QB 946. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 1:05 am
Dow Jones ([2005] QB 946), which effectively requires the claimant to show more than minimal actual damage to his reputation, if his action is not to interfere disproportionately with the defendant’s freedom of expression. [read post]
28 May 2024, 11:38 am
On the same day there was a hearing Titan v Okunola KB-2024-000960. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
Co. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 2:52 am
The first was Jameel (Yousef) v Dow Jones & Co Inc [2005] QB 946, [2005] EWCA Civ 75 (03 February 2005) … The Court of Appeal held that it was an abuse of process for the action before them to proceed “where so little is now seen to be at stake”, and duly struck it out. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 2:11 pm
” Jones v. [read post]
27 May 2010, 12:08 am
Is “substantial harm” different from the “real and substantial tort” test set out by the Court of Appeal in Jameel v Dow Jones ([2005] QB 946) – which has been applied in a number of recent cases (see our post here)? [read post]
MBL/Inforrm Conference Paper: “Defamation Bill: Trivial Libels and Jurisdiction” – Hugh Tomlinson QC
20 Jul 2010, 4:30 am
The Explanatory Notes to the Bill point out that there is already jurisdiction, deriving from the case of Jameel v Dow Jones ([2005] QB 946) to strike out a case as an abuse of the process if the publication does not amount to a “real and substantial tort”. [read post]
