Search for: "Downloader 97" Results 281 - 300 of 497
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Nov 2015, 6:19 am by Ben
Trubridge, who had once been in a successful 70s pop band, said his band got just 3% of the 'recorded music' share of any stream - with his label (who were originally Magnet, now owned by Warners) taking the rest - 97%. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 10:05 pm by Jeff Richardson
  For example, a 2 hour and 21 minute episode of The Talk Show (97 MB) took me about six minutes to transfer. [read post]
15 May 2023, 2:00 am by Robyn Rawlings, Webex
According to a Buffer report, 97% of employees want to work remotely at least part time for the rest of their careers. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 4:06 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Implicitly this meant that a patent could not be granted (A 97(1) in conjunction with A 78(1)(c) EPC 1973), and had to result in the refusal of the application (A 97(2)). [1.3.1] In this context the relevant legal question is whether the statement of grounds of appeal sets out why, according to the appellant, the ED was not correct in basing its decision on the ground that there was no set of claims admitted under R 137(3). [1.3.2] The text of R 137(3) which is applicable to the… [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
”Should you wish to download the whole document (in German), just click here.To have a look at the file wrapper, click here. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
According to this case law the said procedural principle is of such fundamental importance that any infringement of it, even as the result of a mistaken interpretation of a request, has to be considered to be a substantial procedural violation (T 552/97; T 647/93).[13] Under these circumstances the requirements of A 67 EPC 1973 are met. [read post]
6 Nov 2010, 12:00 pm by Oliver G. Randl
On the contrary, it is incumbent upon the appellant to maintain unamended or to amend - optionally on an auxiliary basis - the application documents upon which examination is to be carried out and a decision eventually to be reached (A 94 and A 97 together with A 113(2) EPC 1973) (see T 300/89 [9.1]), and not upon the ED to prolong the examination procedure beyond the procedural framework set out in the EPC (see in this respect A 123(1) together with R 86(3) EPC 1973) until the applicant… [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
”A similar position is also held by other Boards of appeal, as can be seen from the cited decisions T 382/96 and T 446/00, but also decisions T 1126/97 [3.1.1 et seq.] and T 47/03 [1.1, 1.4 et seq.] as well as T 745/03 [2.2] and T 221/0 [read post]
10 Jul 2010, 11:02 am by Oliver G. Randl
If you wish to do so, you can download it here. [read post]
8 May 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Moreover, the application was told that the application could be refused under A 97(1) EPC 1973 (now A 97(2)) if the deficiency was not overcome.[5] According to the Board, the objection pursuant to R 29(2) EPC 1973 (now R 43(2)) against the original claims 1, 18 and 22 was clear and unambiguous. [read post]
23 Dec 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
In particular, no reasons are provided as to why neither the claimed fact that “the assets are wells to drill” […] nor the purpose of the claim 1 according to its preamble, namely to “determin[e] how many wells to drill” confer technical character on the claimed method. [3] Points 13-15 of the decision cite T 258/03, T 641/00 and T 1173/97 as established jurisprudence and suggest that the ED means to follow the principles laid out in these decisions. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
It is rather for the intervener to establish that a request to cease an alleged infringement was addressed to him (see: T 392/97 [2.2 et seq.]; T 887/04 [2.1 et seq.]; Benkard/Schäfers, EPÜ, 2nd edition 2012, A 105, para. 15; Günzel in Singer/Stauder, EPÜ, 5th edition 2010, Article 105, para. 3). [1.8.7] The intervener’s letters to [the patent proprietor] and the latter’s replies […] cannot be qualified as a surrogate alternative for such a request. [read post]
9 Mar 2013, 11:01 am by oliver randl
Case Law of the Boards of Appeal of the EPO, 6th edition, 2010, section III.A.2, and decisions T 1067/97, T 25/03, T 1408/04 cited therein. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Thus, the content of the email constitutes mere “cognitive data” in the terms of T 1194/97 [3.3] and therefore does not contribute to the technical character of the claimed invention. [read post]
5 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Also the [patent proprietor] alleges that proteins and polysaccharides have different stabilisation requirements during lyophilization […].[46] In view of the circumstances depicted above, the board concludes that neither the patent nor the prior art provides convincing evidence that the claimed lyophilized compositions achieve the desired technical effect to be achieved in accordance with the underlying problem, i.e. the improvement of the stability of an unconjugated MenC… [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 11:47 am by Susan Brenner
[P]eople throughout the world have downloaded and viewed the images of the abuse. [read post]