Search for: "Downs v. Powell"
Results 281 - 300
of 536
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Aug 2014, 10:14 am
Court of Appeal The Court of Appeal (Arden, Black, Briggs LJJ) dismissed the appeal, finding that the approach to proportionality under the Equality Act 2010 was the same as that under Article 8 in Manchester City Council v Pinnock [2011] 2 AC 104 and Hounslow London Borough Council v Powell [2011] 2 AC 186: 27 In my judgment, the approach to proportionality under Article 8 in Pinnock and Powell is in fact the same approach as… [read post]
5 Jul 2014, 8:17 pm
Supreme Court decision in McCullen v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 6:48 am
Powell, 497 So.2d 1188, 1191 (Fla.1986) (emphasis added). [read post]
20 May 2014, 5:30 pm
Federal Judge Strikes Down Pennsylvania Same-Sex Marriage Ban – Harrisburg lawyer Lee Tankle of McNees Wallace & Nurick on the firm’s Pennsylvania Labor & Employment Blog Oklahoma Joins the Patent Troll Hunt – Jacob Martinez and Tod Melgar of Chadbourne & Parke on the firm’s blog, TMT Perspectives Cybersecurity Securities Class Actions are Coming: Predictions, Analysis, and Practical Guidance – Seattle attorney Douglas Greene of Lane Powell… [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 12:00 pm
Wade and Doe v. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 9:42 am
In Apodaca v. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 3:21 am
Where do you come down on this? [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 9:35 am
Rehnquist (who clerked for Justice Jackson), to the ruling in National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 10:02 pm
Powell. 2009. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 8:44 am
Question: If left to his own devices, where might Justice William Brennan have taken Sullivan after it was handed down in 1964? [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 4:02 pm
There five published “resolved complaints”: Andrew Newman v Daily Mail (clause 1), Morag Powell v Scotsman (clauses 1 and 3), Bryony Hill v Mail on Sunday (clauses 1, 3 and 4), Sean McGrath v Herald (Glasgow) (clause 1) and Peter Jones v Daily Telegraph (clause 1). [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 4:29 am
Originally published March 19, 2013.The Supreme Court handed down a huge decision in copyright law today, ruling in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 4:05 pm
There were Powell v Birmingham Mail (Clause 1), Landers v Darlington and Stockton Times (Clause 1), Dobson v Sun (Clause 1), Fellows v Sunday Mercury (Clauses 1 and 5), Choudry v Daily Mail (Clause 1), Buchan v Daily Mail (Clause 1), Rape Crisis v Daily Mail (Clause 1), Brown v Lincolnshire Echo (Clauses 3 and 5), Cousins v Times (Clause 1). [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 7:07 am
FEC dissenters and Justices Stewart, Powell, and Douglas. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 6:31 am
Powell rule that Fourth Amendment claims aren’t cognizable on habeas). [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm
Powell, who voted in favor of upholding the death penalty in and Furman v. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 12:02 pm
The more recent was Washington v. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 4:00 am
Cross-posted on the Law Theories blog. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court recently declined to grant review in the very interesting case of Saint John’s Church in the Wilderness v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
Although it was the product of a 2-1 split decision, the ruling in United States v. [read post]
